Offline
WLKK-FM will soon have a new name. The station will be calling itself WGR-FM, beginning Wed., Feb. 19th. It's a case of history repeating itself. Before it became WGRQ and then WGRF, 96.9 was an automated oldies station that shared the call sign with its AM 550 counterpart.
As Radio Insight points out, that's not the only blast from the past - the frequency at 107.7 was once home to WNSA. Its format? All sports and a competitor to WGR-AM.
Offline
WNSA was from where the much maligned Mike Schopp originated before he went to WGR-AM.
Offline
What is currently WLKK must be literally one of the most historically "flip-happy" stations in the history of the industry, at least in North America. What is now WBUF 92.9 is another station worthy of this notable title.
In the early 2010s, WLKK had an alt-rock format and later an FM simulcast of WBEN 930. Unfortunately, neither were successful and the signal was barely receivable for me in Mississauga on the Grundig S350DL that I had at the time (the best performing radio I had ever used at the time) due low signal strength stemming in large part from its notoriously less-than-optimal transmitter location and splatter from CJXY 107.9.
Poor coverage in the Golden Horseshoe probably isn't a concern for management, but it's been noted in other topics here and in others on RadioDiscussions over the years that the WLKK signal is also questionable in parts of the Buffalo area itself, particularly (and most unfortunately) the most heavily populated ones.
I have to wonder if the management actually have "high hopes" for this move or if they just figure that "it's worth a try" given the popularity of the WGR AM station itself after years and years of unsuccessful uses for the 107.7 signal.
Offline
tdotwriter wrote:
but it's been noted in other topics here and in others on RadioDiscussions over the years that the WLKK signal is also questionable in parts of the Buffalo area itself, particularly (and most unfortunately) the most heavily populated ones.
There's a repeater on 104.7 in those areas now.
Offline
RadioAaron wrote:
tdotwriter wrote:
but it's been noted in other topics here and in others on RadioDiscussions over the years that the WLKK signal is also questionable in parts of the Buffalo area itself, particularly (and most unfortunately) the most heavily populated ones.
There's a repeater on 104.7 in those areas now.
I seriously forgot about the 104.7 "translator" (retransmitter). That makes perfect sense, but how well does it perform signal and user-reception wise?
Offline

Offline

I have said it many times on this forum but my favorite era for 107.7 was as WUWU. I have hours of air checks from that incarnation. The WLKK call letters are a hold-over from when it had a very lepid triple A format known as The Lake. I believe that started over 20 years ago and remained such for a number of years.. When the station became alt rock The Lake switched to HD2 on 107.7.
Here's a small snip from that time:
WLKK HD2
Last edited by Fitz (February 12, 2026 5:45 pm)
Offline

A follow up to my above post. Here's a gonzo comp I put together on YT for WUWU. Including two great stations ID's:
Offline
I have low hopes.
The WBEN simlecast only lasted for 2 years before flipping to alt.
Offline
Scarboroughbluffsradiof99 wrote:
I have low hopes.
The WBEN simlecast only lasted for 2 years before flipping to alt.
That didn't include 104.7, and FM moves/simulcasts rarely help NewsTalk but usually help Sports.
Offline
On January 1, 1973, WGR-FM (the one at 96.9) made a big deal of adding a "Q" to its call letters - back in the day when call letters still mattered.
The New Q was introduced exactly at the stroke of midnight New Year's Eve, and it's since become WGRF.
But this rare aircheck of that moment, from Dale Patterson's Rock Radio Scrapbook, contains the final "WGR-FM" jingle ever aired. It also shows the elaborate lengths they went to to introduce their new format.
WGRQ, by the way, was a terrific Top 40 station in its time and in those days, it mostly came in like a local. Now you're lucky if you can get it in Toronto most days.
WGR-FM Becomes WGRQ
Offline
I will be watching to see if WGR does what every other AM-FM simulcast does - virtually abandon its stronger signal and refer to itself on-air only by its new frequency. The station has been around for decades and spent much of its ad budget reminding listeners of how far their AM signal traveled.
This ad is from 1952, long before most stations were acknowledging that FM even existed.
Offline
11 call letter changes to go along with 12 format changes since 1948. The longest being an affilliate of Pat Robertson's Christian Broadcast Network from 1969-81.
Offline

RadioActive wrote:
On January 1, 1973, WGR-FM (the one at 96.9) made a big deal of adding a "Q" to its call letters - back in the day when call letters still mattered.
The New Q was introduced exactly at the stroke of midnight New Year's Eve, and it's since become WGRF.
But this rare aircheck of that moment, from Dale Patterson's Rock Radio Scrapbook, contains the final "WGR-FM" jingle ever aired. It also shows the elaborate lengths they went to to introduce their new format.
WGRQ, by the way, was a terrific Top 40 station in its time and in those days, it mostly came in like a local. Now you're lucky if you can get it in Toronto most days.
WGR-FM Becomes WGRQ
Because I could only pick up their signal in my car, I drove around from 11:30 PM until 12:30 AM, in my '73 Gremlin X, waiting and listening for the "change".
YES - I was girl-friendless for this and other reasons ![]()
Offline
I gather the calls WZGR were granted today...
Offline
Saul wrote:
I gather the calls WZGR were granted today...
Sorta. The FCC's application system doesn't accept 3-digit calls, so Audacy had to apply for a 'dummy' set. The actual call-letters upon approval are WGR-FM.
Offline
Thanks for clarifying.
Offline
"Since the transmitter strengthens the signal to the east, WGR will have a stronger presence in the Batavia and Rochester areas.
And...the FM station also will have a clearer sound.
According to radio insiders, a third possible benefit will be getting ahead of a potential local station that could start a sports format."
WGR-AM simulcast on 107.7 FM will expand reach to Rochester
Offline
I like Pergament, but he's a little off base on this one, as I mentioned in my NERW column today. Audacy already *has* a sports station here in Rochester, WROC 950 (also heard on WBEE-HD2 and a translator on 95.7), which had also been carrying One Bills Live along with the Sabres and Bills (who have also been on Audacy's WCMF 96.5).
If anything, expanding the reach of WGR into the Rochester market could actually hurt Audacy slightly, because any listener tuning into WGR-FM in Rochester won't do anything for WGR-FM's ratings in the Buffalo market, and could take away from WROC's already fairly small ratings here. Unless 950/95.7 here becomes mostly a WGR simulcast, which would be more interesting than the Westwood One Sports content they're mostly carrying here outside of a local 3-6 PM sports talk show.
Offline
WLLK flipped this morning to being a WGR simulcast.
Offline
The official flip was supposed to be Thursday. Wonder why they moved it up. I suppose they had nothing to lose either way.
Should be interesting to see how they start I.D-ing themselves on air. Most FMs that started as AMs and still simulcast almost always identify themselves solely by their new frequency. But then again WGR 55 is so ingrained in the market, maybe they'll be the exception to the rule by having both.
Offline
RadioActive wrote:
The official flip was supposed to be Thursday. Wonder why they moved it up. I suppose they had nothing to lose either way.
The programming's on the signals, but I wouldn't say it's officially launched. I guess we'll see the branding Thursday.
Offline
RadioAaron wrote:
Can you hear the FM signal from Toronto?
I’m in Florida so can’t check it out.
For me 550 in Newmarket comes in weak at times
Offline
I can get neither FM, but I'm downtown.
Offline
The only way you can hear it in toronto is if you have an HD radio.
WLKK is on 1 of WKSE's hd subchannels.
Because wgr is also on a subchannel, will audacy do the smart thing and put the star format on an hd subchannel?
Offline
Nice to see they kept the 550 in their logo. That's unlike most stations that go to an FM simulcast, who seem to suddenly forget they even have a signal on the other band. But it could be because the FM signal is weak. I live in northern North York and 550 AM beams in here perfectly. I can't get either of the other frequencies listed at all.
Offline
Scarboroughbluffsradiof99 wrote:
The only way you can hear it in toronto is if you have an HD radio.
WLKK is on 1 of WKSE's hd subchannels.
Because wgr is also on a subchannel, will audacy do the smart thing and put the star format on an hd subchannel?
It no longer needs to be on the WSKE sub-channel as they can now say that 104.7 is relaying 550 AM. Star is already on 107.7's subchannel.
Offline
RadioActive wrote:
Nice to see they kept the 550 in their logo. That's unlike most stations that go to an FM simulcast, who seem to suddenly forget they even have a signal on the other band. But it could be because the FM signal is weak. I live in northern North York and 550 AM beams in here perfectly. I can't get either of the other frequencies listed at all.
Do you have an HD radio?
Its on 1 of WKSE's hd subchannels.
But I'm near the bluffs so I can get WKSE like a local sometimes.
Offline
RadioAaron wrote:
Scarboroughbluffsradiof99 wrote:
The only way you can hear it in toronto is if you have an HD radio.
WLKK is on 1 of WKSE's hd subchannels.
Because wgr is also on a subchannel, will audacy do the smart thing and put the star format on an hd subchannel?It no longer needs to be on the WSKE sub-channel as they can now say that 104.7 is relaying 550 AM. Star is already on 107.7's subchannel.
What I ment was move the star format from 107.7 HD 2 to 1 of WKSE's subchannels.