LT Col Daniel Davis is no leftie. In fact he is a Republican who was even going to work in the Trump admin  ( as an assistant to Tulsi Gabbard) but was taken out by the neo cons for his foreign policy views. A gulf war veteran turned whistleblower. A person who has been deeply concerned about the wars the US has engaged in,

He's hoping mad about this:




 
 

I think the US press should boycott reporting on “him” and really make up some fake news, seriously, give him what he wants. All of them, Fox included, need a united front here as freedom of the press is under attack. Of course this is just a distraction from the real problems, tired, old Toolbox tactic.

I see it on his channel. 2nd vid. That rank may change over time.

Daniel Davis

Last edited by Fitz (September 19, 2026 1:47 pm)

turkeytop wrote:

betaylored wrote:

Almost a badge of honour at this point some might say...

What are the chances his next stunt is taking the Canadian tuxedo (denim jacket and jeans) and renaming it the American tuxedo?

Canada Geese will become America Geese.
 

 
well he is all about feathering his own nest so you could be on to something turkeytop 🙄😑😃

betaylored wrote:

turkeytop wrote:

betaylored wrote:

Almost a badge of honour at this point some might say...

What are the chances his next stunt is taking the Canadian tuxedo (denim jacket and jeans) and renaming it the American tuxedo?

Canada Geese will become America Geese.
 

 
well he is all about feathering his own nest so you could be on to something turkeytop 🙄😑😃

He hates somalia, but he's running his country like that dump.
If you hate somalia so much, why be like them?

This is clearly unconstitutional and should not withstand a court challenge, which I hope comes soon. Still, you never know.

The greatest irony of this story may be that the head of the White House Correspondents Assn., which represents all press at the home of the President, is headed by a Fox News journalist, and she has been vociferous in her objections to these moves. But her network has not. 

My guess is that the courts will rule in favour of the banned networks, since it's clearly illegal for any official to ban a reputable news organization from a press conference because someone doesn't like their reporting. It's not only in the U.S. Constitution, it's the very First Amendment. This cannot be allowed to stand. 
 

Trump and those around him must know that the courts will rule against them in banning certain news organizations they don't like from the White House.  However it is disturbing that they think it is ok to try anyway.  Something is terribly wrong when the current president and a lot of his government feel that the press or anyone who disagrees and not on side with them, must be punished.  Pretty sad how these fools seem to get away with everything they want.  Where are the checks and balances??  

ckg927 wrote:

paterson1 wrote:

Trump and those around him must know that the courts will rule against them in banning certain news organizations they don't like from the White House.  However it is disturbing that they think it is ok to try anyway.  Something is terribly wrong when the current president and a lot of his government feel that the press or anyone who disagrees and not on side with them, must be punished.  Pretty sad how these fools seem to get away with everything they want.  Where are the checks and balances??  

Well, as it turns out CNN, MS Now and Politico HAVE sued in regards to the new rules.

Also, today EVERY major TV news organization stepped away from the White House press pool. Yes, even Fox. So no network gets any of the footage shown of the President. And right in the middle of the UN General Assembly meeting this week, too.

 
https://youtu.be/2v_Gb6a49QQ?si=s-o_nh2tOr5SFEks

Kaitlan Collins from CNN with the story on the bottle blonde behind the ban.

Last edited by betaylored (September 21, 2026 2:12 pm)

If you can't beat 'em, join em. (But just don't watch 'em...)

White House Launches Trump TV Amid Media Ban

Saul wrote:

US Pravda.

Yes this will compliment Fox News Network, the original state propoganda network in America...

This ridiculous promo helped launch "Trump TV" on YouTube.

But after watching the 60 sec. video, I have only one question: did they pay for all the clips from other hit TV shows (including Seinfeld, Family Guy and Friends) that are used in the thing? There are ton of them that go by at breakneck speed, and I can't help but wonder if they paid for the rights to use them.

My guess is that the answer is no, but I'd be very curious to know.

He's probably now fuming about the silent treatment. Unintended consequences ?







 

RadioActive wrote:

This ridiculous promo helped launch "Trump TV" on YouTube.

But after watching the 60 sec. video, I have only one question: did they pay for all the clips from other hit TV shows (including Seinfeld, Family Guy and Friends) that are used in the thing? There are ton of them that go by at breakneck speed, and I can't help but wonder if they paid for the rights to use them.

My guess is that the answer is no, but I'd be very curious to know.

 
A truly horrendous promo, and not because of the subject matter. The graphics are terrible and the concept is lame, and yes, they should be sued for the show clips used, but won’t be. You’d think Team Trump could come up with something that actually worked, after all, he is the president…..

RadioActive wrote:

Here's the irony of all ironies about this situation. The head of the White House Correspondents' Association is a reporter named Jacqui Heinrich. What's the big deal about that? She happens to be the Chief White House correpondent for Fox News, the last place you'd expect to hear any criticism of the current White House occupant. 

But even she was forced to issue a strongly worded statement condemning the action. 

They say politics makes strange bedfellows. If so, there's your proof. 

So who's left to cover the whitehouse?
My guess is one america and internet influencers.