Offline
I thought long and hard before posting this, because I hate getting into politics here. But this may be a reasonable exception because the threat is to the very heart of the news media itself.
If you remember the late 1960's, you might recall Richard Nixon's war on the media. But that was a schoolyard fight compared to what may be in the offing in the next half decade. Donald Trump, who famously branded any story that even remotely criticized him as "fake news." is now in a position to fire on the free press with all guns blazing. And it's already started.
He's appointed an extreme right winger as head of the FCC, and it didn't take long for the games to begin. A week after making his pick, Brendan Carr, the new honcho, is already going after the major networks because Trump didn't like their coverage of him.
This story explains how he's going after CBS, NBC and ABC for a host of imagined offences, and threatening the broadcast licences for their owned and operated stations.
The new president has already demanded MSNBC lose its licence to broadcast, showing how little he knows - being cable only, they don't actually need a licence, per se. He obviously can't do anything about them, but he could threaten the business interests of the major networks that own them.
Then there's the Voice of America and Radio Free Europe, once the beacons of truth broadcast to areas where sinister government controlled media was the only real choice. Many listened at their own peril, but they wanted to hear a different side. Now even that's being threatened.
We can only hope news people don't surrender to this monster for corporate reasons and stand up to this bully. It scares me that that might not happen. And as the above stories show, it's only just getting started. They need to cover this idiot like a blanket and point out all his flaws and stupid decisions and not kowtow in fear of him. Once you lose freedom of the press, you lose everything.
Only one thing is certain: it's going to be a very long four years. I hope those in the newsrooms of America stay strong for all of it. Or soon, "fake news" may be the only news too many down south will hear.
-30-
Offline
Which is why I am so reluctant to vote Conservative here. I agree that the CBC needs a reboot - especially TV, but I don't want the English section decimated.
Last edited by andysradio (January 23, 2025 11:31 am)
Offline
Five weeks ago ABC apologized and agreed to pay $15M to President Trump for defamation.
Offline
That was a specific case in which George Stephanopoulos said Trump was guilty of rape and not sexually abusing and defaming her, which was the verdict.
So yes, it was an unfortunate accidental use of the wrong term while he was ad libbing and the network paid the price for that mistake.
None of which detracts from the fact the current occupant of the White House was found guilty of a pretty awful crime!
Offline
I WILL be voting Conservative in the next election. I am sick and tired of Justin Trudeau and his supporters telling me I have an "unacceptable" opinion.
Offline
As America hurtles down the road to fascism, there are plenty of Canadians who think, "Hey, us too!".
It's incredible how 80 years has blinded people to the insanity.
Offline
mace wrote:
I WILL be voting Conservative in the next election. I am sick and tired of Justin Trudeau and his supporters telling me I have an "unacceptable" opinion.
Good for you.
Polievre is not as bad as trump.
Trump's acting like the thing he hates, an Arab dictater.
Offline
Yes, I kind of expected this might devolve into an Us vs. Them discussion. The real point I was making was not about left vs. right, but a real threat to the media - which is what we discuss here - and freedom of the press.
I'm not sure it's ever been so threatened in the more than 200 years the U.S. has existed. To me, nothing is more precious.
And my fear is, unlike in Nixon's time, corporate interests will give in to a megalomaniac's whims in order to keep their business models afloat. News used to be sacrosanct, immune from other areas of a business. I worry it's not that way anymore.
Offline
I am voting for quitting this board altogether because of the political crap. I am sick and tired of it! Every thread turns into a one side versus another argument. Do we really need to drag partisan politics into this board? No, no and NO.
If the political arguments on this board do not end now and permanently, I *will* have RA close my account and I will never again visit the SOWNY board.
Offline
Well said RA. As this article in The Nation points out, the American media seems prepared to surrender its hard-won freedoms in the face of Trump's bluster in order to maintain access to the White House.
The Media is Giving Away Its Rights Even Before Trump Tries to Take Them
Offline
In the past federally, I have voted Liberal and Conservative about equal. This time it will be Conservative. I don't particularly like Pierre, and I am against defunding CBC. However, I learned a long time ago, no leader and no party is always going to align with everything I want. I don't think defunding CBC will be as easy as he thinks or if he can actually do this. He could however cut back on the amount they receive, which could happen under a new Liberal leader as well. Like it or not, cuts are coming, and Canada will go through some belt tightening as we did years ago with Paul Martin as finance minister.
What is going to happen in the US will be unfortunate. Sorry to say, but our US friends blew it. All the signs were there that Trump was not a good choice and not fit to lead the country. But he won anyway. I think many soft Republicans are going to regret their vote from a few months ago. They may even think and talk about the Biden and Obama administrations as "the good old days" in a few years.
Offline
The purges are already in full swing in the government apparatus and academia. Some in the media are starting to feel it - a weather reporter in winconsin was allegedly fired after objecting to Elon Musk's nazi salutes.
The migrant roundups are also starting and will spread beyond 'illegal' immigrants (and eventually beyond immigrants altogether).
Expect a lot of dazed incomprehensible reactions from Americans. Few alive today have actually experienced what is currently under way.
Offline
Forward Power wrote:
I am voting for quitting this board altogether because of the political crap. I am sick and tired of it! Every thread turns into a one side versus another argument. Do we really need to drag partisan politics into this board? No, no and NO.
If the political arguments on this board do not end now and permanently, I *will* have RA close my account and I will never again visit the SOWNY board.
I just don't understand why veering into related politics irks you THAT much. The two subjects (media AND politics) are indeed intertwined, and sometimes, I like getting a pulse of radio people's views. Far right and mid-right viewpoint tend to bother me, and their rationale for things make me shake my head. However, some of the political discussion is INDEED relevant. I say, just skip the thread if it bothers you.
Offline
The age of corporate media gatekeepers is over. They extinguished themselves. Trump is redressing what remains.
Offline
Chrisphen wrote:
The purges are already in full swing in the government apparatus and academia. Some in the media are starting to feel it - a weather reporter in winconsin was allegedly fired after objecting to Elon Musk's nazi salutes.
The migrant roundups are also starting and will spread beyond 'illegal' immigrants (and eventually beyond immigrants altogether).
Expect a lot of dazed incomprehensible reactions from Americans. Few alive today have actually experienced what is currently under way.
It neads to only stop at elegals and those spreading Strickt, arab islamic values.
Those muslims are making normal muslims like bosnians, albanians and gujarati/kuchi muslims look bad.
Send those arabs back to the middle east! and keep them there.I think the propper turm I'm looking for is ishmaili muslims.
The ishmaili's are proud Canadians while keeping the good parts of Indian and some pakistani culture.
I know some.
The ishmailis that I know also love Canadian/christian holidays like Christmas.
They will also invite you into there home even if your not their ethnic group, unlike some arab and somali muslims.
Some arabs in canada are not even alowed to listen to Canadian radio stations and western music.
Last edited by Scarboroughbluffsradiof99 (January 23, 2025 1:14 pm)
Offline
Forward Power wrote:
I am voting for quitting this board altogether because of the political crap. I am sick and tired of it! Every thread turns into a one side versus another argument. Do we really need to drag partisan politics into this board? No, no and NO.
If the political arguments on this board do not end now and permanently, I *will* have RA close my account and I will never again visit the SOWNY board.
That would be a real loss to us all. Or at least to me.
I try to avoid politics here as you know, but someone threatening news judgment lead me to make this one exception. I will try to keep this off here, but there's a lot of turmoil about to come crashing down on us all and I'm not sure how to stop it. I thought the fact there were three separate articles in virtually the same day about a potential crackdown on the information providers was an emergency.
I would ask you only to please skip this thread and look at the others. I hate the politics as much as you, but as a fan of freedom of speech in broadcasting, I fear for the future. This was a warning cry before it's too late.
Let's try and make this one of the last ones. Although with the passion many here feel about this subject, I can't guarantee it will be!
Offline
Jody Thornton wrote:
I just don't understand why veering into related politics irks you THAT much. The two subjects (media AND politics) are indeed intertwined, and sometimes, I like getting a pulse of radio people's views. Far right and mid-right viewpoint tend to bother me, and their rationale for things make me shake my head. However, some of the political discussion is INDEED relevant. I say, just skip the thread if it bothers you.
Ultimatums aren't helpful for deciding what should or should not be discussed on SOWNY. We might lose X number of people if we allow politics, but we might lose X number of people if we disallow politics. People who want to be here should be here. The Topic list in the index tells us pretty explicitly what's inside. I'll add, however, that there's a pretty clear line between discussion about media and politics, and partisanship. And somehow we sometimes fail to either see or care about that line. I'm interested in insight from all of you, but I don't need (or want) to know who you vote for (I can often figure it out, anyhow, because we generally drop enough clues, over time, in even casual, amicable, non-partisan discussion).
Offline
Saul wrote:
Ultimatums aren't helpful for deciding what should or should not be discussed on SOWNY. We might lose X number of people if we allow politics, but we might lose X number of people if we disallow politics. People who want to be here should be here. The Topic list in the index tells us pretty explicitly what's inside. I'll add, however, that there's a pretty clear line between discussion about media and politics, and partisanship. And somehow we sometimes fail to either see or care about that line. I'm interested in insight from all of you, but I don't need (or want) to know who you vote for (I can often figure it out, anyhow, because we generally drop enough clues, over time, in even casual, amicable, non-partisan discussion).
Well Saul, I'm not trying to raise an ultimatum, or find out how people vote. I do like seeing how they think, mind you, as that may (eventually/perhaps) affect what happens to me and others in the medium to long-term. I just like to gauge people's priorities, and see if it reveals where things might be going. No amount of being challenging or disagreeable is intended in any way.
Offline
I don't think Donald Trump is the big bad guy everyone on the 'Left' thinks he is.
He's more like a useful idiot for the party and it's policies since he's so popular.
He also partnered with RFK to set up a commission to study (and fix) america's health problem including childhood diabetes and autism rates.
link:
as for politics in the media, mass media has for a long time been either on one side or the other. Anyone who can't understand that should just turn off the news. There is bias either way and misconceptions both ways too.
"=12pxDonald Trump, who famously branded any story that even remotely criticized him as "fake news."" --much of it was fake news. There was no Russia connection ever proven for example so that nonsense spewed out on MSNBC and CNN for years was just BS. Also take note that those 'democratic supporter' media largely ignored stories like the Hunter Biden situation out of convenience.
He's about putting USA manufacturing back to work and mostly that is why he got elected in the swing states.
Offline
Jody Thornton wrote:
Saul wrote:
Ultimatums aren't helpful for deciding what should or should not be discussed on SOWNY. We might lose X number of people if we allow politics, but we might lose X number of people if we disallow politics. People who want to be here should be here. The Topic list in the index tells us pretty explicitly what's inside. I'll add, however, that there's a pretty clear line between discussion about media and politics, and partisanship. And somehow we sometimes fail to either see or care about that line. I'm interested in insight from all of you, but I don't need (or want) to know who you vote for (I can often figure it out, anyhow, because we generally drop enough clues, over time, in even casual, amicable, non-partisan discussion).
Well Saul, I'm not trying to raise an ultimatum, or find out how people vote. I do like seeing how they think, mind you, as that may (eventually/perhaps) affect what happens to me and others in the medium to long-term. I just like to gauge people's priorities, and see if it reveals where things might be going. No amount of being challenging or disagreeable is intended in any way.
The ultimatum wasn't yours...I quoted you because you spoke reasonably...
Offline
Saul wrote:
The ultimatum wasn't yours...I quoted you because you spoke reasonably...
Well, I do appreciate that. I try to be reasonable, but I don't always get it ...lol My apologies for the misunderstanding.
Offline
dmcjeff wrote:
as for politics in the media, mass media has for a long time been either on one side or the other. Anyone who can't understand that should just turn off the news. There is bias either way and misconceptions both ways too.
...
He's about putting USA manufacturing back to work and mostly that is why he got elected in the swing states.
The journalists I've known and have dealt with over the years through associations like the Canadian Association of Journalists (CAJ) and Investigative Reporters and Editors (IRE) work hard to report neutrally and fairly. Serious and very legitimate investigative journalists and beat reporters have worked their asses off keeping abreast of the various people and organizations in their area of specialty, scouring official and even unofficial records and details regardless of a politician's particular stripes, whether it's Trudeau or Mulroney or Biden or Bush or whomever; and looking into poor or non-performance by departments and authorities regardless of which party happens to have been in power at any particular time.
It's true that a lot of news organizations, at the very top, sometimes take sides through editorials, for instance. And there are structural challenges posed by advertiser influence, corporate directorships, cross-ownerships, and more sumbliminal problems such as internal biases which can potentially impact which stories get covered, and sometimes how they're covered (or not). But there's also an abundance of solid reporters and reporting at the street level. And when a candidate or elected political official states things that are demonstrably and categorically untrue, then fair, honest and neutral journalism has a duty to report that. Reporting lies and untruths does not equal bashing politicians or taking sides, though it might very well appear that way to those holding a strong partisan view.
Last edited by Saul (January 23, 2025 2:26 pm)
Offline
Jody Thornton wrote:
Saul wrote:
The ultimatum wasn't yours...I quoted you because you spoke reasonably..
Well, I do appreciate that. I try to be reasonable, but I don't always get it ...lol
My apologies for the misunderstanding.
No apology needed. I think we all just need a few good drinks. Yeah, that'll chill us all out. This whole thread is beginning to remind me of the Trudeau-brand wine bottle opener someone once gave me. It's OK with red wine. But when the cork breaks on a bottle of white, I blame Trudeau.
Offline
Politicians lie all the time.
Almost ALL do.
I'm wondering why the focus on Trump then?
Can someone name three examples of terrible lies he's said publicly?
As for reporters and their agencies/media outlets reporting fair and neutrally; I can think of a current affair where almost none are reporting fairly on the Israel/Palestine Conflict in Gaza. Whenever Israel murders civilians in Gaza (likely 50 to 100k by the time counting is done), the term 'Palestinians died' is used as if they passed away from unlucky or natural causes. When freedom fighters from Hamas (under apartheid) broke out on Oct 7th and murdered local israeli civilians, the term 'Killed' is used. Daily headlines like this are monitored and pointed out almost daily recently and regularly for the past two decades under apartheid rule. It could be that the reporters are using their own bias in the reporting terms, or it could be more nefarious where there are financial backings to various media from certain special interest groups. That said, anytime I hear someone suggesting that reporters and the media are fair and neutral; I can't relate. Previous to the current conflict in Gaza, there was similar style reporting in Afghanistan and Iraq where civilians would have 'died' while our soldiers were killed during our invasion into their countries.
Saul wrote:
dmcjeff wrote:
as for politics in the media, mass media has for a long time been either on one side or the other. Anyone who can't understand that should just turn off the news. There is bias either way and misconceptions both ways too.
...
He's about putting USA manufacturing back to work and mostly that is why he got elected in the swing states.The journalists I've known and have dealt with over the years through associations like the Canadian Association of Journalists (CAJ) and Investigative Reporters and Editors (IRE) work hard to report neutrally and fairly. Serious and very legitimate investigative journalists and beat reporters have worked their asses off keeping abreast of the various people and organizations in their area of specialty, scouring official and even unofficial records and details regardless of a politician's particular stripes, whether it's Trudeau or Mulroney or Biden or Bush or whomever; and looking into poor or non-performance by departments and authorities regardless of which party happens to have been in power at any particular time.
It's true that a lot of news organizations, at the very top, sometimes take sides through editorials, for instance. And there are structural challenges posed by advertiser influence, corporate directorships, cross-ownerships, and more sumbliminal problems such as internal biases which can potentially impact which stories get covered, and sometimes how they're covered (or not). But there's also an abundance of solid reporters and reporting at the street level. And when a candidate or elected political official states things that are demonstrably and categorically untrue, then fair, honest and neutral journalism has a duty to report that. Reporting lies and untruths does not equal bashing politicians or taking sides, though it might very well appear that way to those holding a strong partisan view.
Offline
Scarboroughbluffsradiof99 wrote:
Chrisphen wrote:
The purges are already in full swing in the government apparatus and academia. Some in the media are starting to feel it - a weather reporter in winconsin was allegedly fired after objecting to Elon Musk's nazi salutes.
The migrant roundups are also starting and will spread beyond 'illegal' immigrants (and eventually beyond immigrants altogether).
Expect a lot of dazed incomprehensible reactions from Americans. Few alive today have actually experienced what is currently under way.It neads to only stop at elegals and those spreading Strickt, arab islamic values.
Those muslims are making normal muslims like bosnians, albanians and gujarati/kuchi muslims look bad.
Send those arabs back to the middle east! and keep them there.I think the propper turm I'm looking for is ishmaili muslims.
The ishmaili's are proud Canadians while keeping the good parts of Indian and some pakistani culture.
I know some.
The ishmailis that I know also love Canadian/christian holidays like Christmas.
They will also invite you into there home even if your not their ethnic group, unlike some arab and somali muslims.
Some arabs in canada are not even alowed to listen to Canadian radio stations and western music.
I am not an adherent to any religion and don't believe that the earth and man were created 5000 years ago. I think the fossils, archeological findings and now genetics tell the story much better. Our ancestors evolved and some of them started to migrate out of Africa about 60.000 years ago and the Americas were the last place settled when people crossed the bering land bridge maybe 20,000 years ago. All of the religious bickering is ill-placed.
Regarding Muslims, they all can't be painted with the same brush. Ismailis are the adherents of the Agha Khan and they are mostly peaceful and entrepreneurial but of course there are always exceptions. You can visit the Agha Khan Museum in North York.
Ex pat Iranians are mostly very anti ayatollahs, anti-religious and pro Shah Some of you may have found this out yourself if you have engaged with any. On the other side, the pious Iranian people are not necessarily the fanatics they have been made out to be. Iran along with Iraq are majority Shia muslim countries and shias are also found in parts of Afghanistan, Pakistan and India and for the most part I don't believe they are extremists like the Taliban. Though some may dress traditionally.
The Taliban in Afghanistan and their like minded ilk in other muslim countries are the main muslim problem. A very backward virulent form of the religion which also has it's adherents in other parts of the Islamic world as well unfortunately.
Last edited by Fitz (January 23, 2025 3:37 pm)
Offline
And some of those afghanis take those taliban values with them here to Canada.
They should learn from iranians, bosnians, albanians and ishmailis.
But the werst muslim immigrants are the somalis.
They don't leav behind their strickt form of islam practissed in Somalia.
You come to this country to get away from strict rule, not to bring it to Canada.
That's what the Bosnians, Albanians and Iranians did.
And the Iranians are still choosing this country to live their lives like Normal Canadians.
And a lot like the conservitive party and support Isrealis and Jews.
Offline
Fitz wrote:
Scarboroughbluffsradiof99 wrote:
Chrisphen wrote:
The purges are already in full swing in the government apparatus and academia. Some in the media are starting to feel it - a weather reporter in winconsin was allegedly fired after objecting to Elon Musk's nazi salutes.
The migrant roundups are also starting and will spread beyond 'illegal' immigrants (and eventually beyond immigrants altogether).
Expect a lot of dazed incomprehensible reactions from Americans. Few alive today have actually experienced what is currently under way.It neads to only stop at elegals and those spreading Strickt, arab islamic values.
Those muslims are making normal muslims like bosnians, albanians and gujarati/kuchi muslims look bad.
Send those arabs back to the middle east! and keep them there.I think the propper turm I'm looking for is ishmaili muslims.
The ishmaili's are proud Canadians while keeping the good parts of Indian and some pakistani culture.
I know some.
The ishmailis that I know also love Canadian/christian holidays like Christmas.
They will also invite you into there home even if your not their ethnic group, unlike some arab and somali muslims.
Some arabs in canada are not even alowed to listen to Canadian radio stations and western music.I am not an adherent to any religion and don't believe that the earth and man were created 5000 years ago. I think the fossils, archeological findings and now genetics tell the story much better. Our ancestors evolved and some of them started to migrate out of Africa about 60.000 years ago and the Americas were the last place settled when people crossed the bering land bridge maybe 20,000 years ago. All of the religious bickering is ill-placed.
Regarding Muslims, they all can't be painted with the same brush. Ismailis are the adherents of the Agha Khan and they are mostly peaceful and entrepreneurial but of course there are always exceptions. You can visit the Agha Khan Museum in North York.
Ex pat Iranians are mostly very anti ayatollahs, anti-religious and pro Shah Some of you may have found this out yourself if you have engaged with any. On the other side, the pious Iranian people are not necessarily the fanatics they have been made out to be. Iran along with Iraq are majority Shia muslim countries and shias are also found in parts of Afghanistan, Pakistan and India and for the most part I don't believe they are extremists like the Taliban. Though some may dress traditionally.
The Taliban in Afghanistan and their like minded ilk in other muslim countries are the main muslim problem. A very backward virulent form of the religion which also has it's adherents in other parts of the Islamic world as well unfortunately.
The taliban should learn from islamic countries like Albania and Bosnia.
In Albania, they alow christians to warship along with muslims.
Women can go out and drive.
And, Albania supports Israeli's.
Last edited by Scarboroughbluffsradiof99 (January 23, 2025 3:47 pm)
Offline
holy shit, what's this thread devolved into? certainly not radio.... how very disappointing i stumbled upon it.
Offline
Actually women can drive in most Islamic countries and could do so in the pre-Taliban Afghanistan which was a relatively progressive place. Saudi Arabia was the last major holdout and even they changed their policy despite their conservativism. Their brand of Islam can also be characterized as bleak. The ruling elite there I think are big hypocrites. All just for show.