At just under the first hour mark there is a clip of Mr. N.. There may very well be more.

Listening online is almost unlistenable because of the subbed-out advertisements in overly repetitious insertion. I miss hearing the local ads when I was able to tune in to the actual station.I wasn't pleased when Humber College started their broadcasting that kept me from doing so.

In case you are able to listen to it once, maybe twice - try ten hours worth of listening...



 

I can't listen to Steppenwolf's "Born To Be Wild" the same way anymore...





vs. the way it was, and should have been left...






 

Check out an AI generated version of Star Wars,

online safety pics

 if it had been made in the 20s...

https://fb.watch/nnRS6tF2Ju/

Is this another "1220" - but in video form?

It's late September (all too soon) and still no Join TV.

They have updated their website from its initial iteration. But, and I did sign up to receive their newsletter(s), I have yet to receive any communication from them at all.

Posted this awhile ago.. 

RadioActive wrote:

After reading this article, I hope it stays away for a long time to come.

Digital Rights Management that could prevent you from recording your favourite show could take us all back to the days where if you missed a show on the air it was gone - until the summer reruns. And you had to be in front of your set to see it.

That will never happen in the days of streaming, of course, but it could still ruin a good thing we've all been enjoying since the days of the home VCR.

Why is ATSC 3.0 Taking So Long? 

I find it a little odd that ALL the cities listed on the map are American, and there are NO Canadian cities/towns at all, for this coverage map of a Canadian station.

Videocipher II (creds to Wikipedia... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Videocipher and image) was the nail-in-the-coffin for free OTA satellite reception.

You can find that one, and more, here. (too) Many of them have the same punch line.

One (I) might have thought JOIN TV would have picked up on this, seeing as F.A.S.T. is part of their 'claim'.

If you're a 'normal' Netflix subscriber, watching your shows via a Smart TV, Roku, etcetera, you may be unaware of this detail of your account that is to be found via logging into your account on a PC/browser. It is the location where you're watching from. I would encourage you to do so at your earliest convenience.

1) Log in to your account then click-on your avatar to drop down the menu - select "Account"
2) Scroll down to the "Security & Privacy" section
3) Click on the "new" hotlink - "Manage access and devices"

What do you see when the page refreshes? I bet there's a very good chance that you do NOT see the city/town that you are actually located within.

I don't. I live in Sudbury and I see East York, London, and Owen Sound as being recent places that Netflix believes I have been watching from.

Click-on the "IP Address" link for any/all locations that are listed and take note that they are different or are the same in some instances.

This, I sincerely believe, is going to be a problem when Netflix puts into effect the "Primary Location" - their method of tracking viewing activity (that is supposedly) not occurring within the same household, and they will then want to charge you extra for doing so. Even if in fact you are not.

I have contacted their support three times over the last three days and today spoke with a supervisor after requesting to do so. That person is located in the Philippines and has no concept of how large an area Ontario is. But that doesn't matter. The fact that they believe I was in three different locations, regardless of how far apart they are, is the problem.

After speaking with their support, the supervisor did say they have been made aware of this by others (already) but need more evidence of this occurring. They are waiting for affected customers like myself, to call and register this issue with them. If you go through the steps I laid out and see the issue of which I speak, I would encourage you to call them as well. 

There

In Phase wrote:

Forward Power wrote:

Believe it or not, the channel 22 tower is still standing today

site location [url]https://www.google.ca/maps/@44.0315789,-79.1384104,398m/data=!3m1!1e3[/url]

As I recall, the channel 22 "Uxbridge" TX had a power of 5 megawatts (ERP), which was the highest power allowed at the time, and the only Canadian TX to operate at this power level.

(you may need to copy & paste the full link as the SOWNY page seems to truncate the link at the comma in the Google Maps link)
 

Try this link - [url=https://www.google.ca/maps/@44.030879,-79.1409954,3a,75y,79.05h,83.57t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1scJlRxiCRkAMkekg2nuH_3Q!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DcJlRxiCRkAMkekg2nuH_3Q%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D239.50136%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192]street view[/url] . Use the thumbwheel to zoom in.

paterson1 wrote:

It was on this day in 1967 that CKFH/1430 went top 40.  The station had been experimenting in the evenings for a few months but went all in on January 2nd to battle 1050 CHUM.  CKEY had surprisingly bowed out of top 40 in 1965, so other than CKOC in Hamilton, CHUM had the youth market to themselves. After 8 years of playing the hits and some album rock CKFH moved to a country format in 1975.  680 CFTR had become the main competitor for CHUM when they adopted top 40 in 1972.  

Mr. "P",

The CKFH tribute site's security certificate looks to have expired. 

I had intended to link to the image of the sunshine sticker, just like the one I had on my '67 Mini back in '1970.

salvare foto instagram

Doug Thompson wrote:

I was operating the Dave Johnson show on CHUM that night.  CHUM went off the air.  There was no backup generator and no power in the control room or anywhere in the building.

It was very eerie....and quiet. 

I had to pick up the 'batphone' every few minutes to see if Program Director Allan Slaight or one of the engineers was calling.

I was listening to CHUM on my transistor radio and if I recall correctly there was little disruption to what I was listening to ,except maybe a brief moment of static, followed shortly by a different voice that I wasn't accustomed to hearing saying (this is) WBZ 1030 Boston and our lights just went out (or words to that effect).

1030 cam in like it was just next door once 1050 disappeared.

I was 13 at the time but it freaked me out a little when over the course of the next half hour or so that they were reporting all of the eastern coast was in the dark.