sowny.net | The Southern Ontario/WNY Radio-TV Forum


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

SOWNY » How Rogers And The CRTC Are Sidelining Canadian Soccer » Yesterday 1:44 pm

torontostan
Replies: 11

Go to post

Radio Bob wrote:

Another reason to preserve the CBC.

Olympics aside, CBC has no place in sports anymore. 

SOWNY » How Rogers And The CRTC Are Sidelining Canadian Soccer » Yesterday 1:44 pm

torontostan
Replies: 11

Go to post

RadioAaron wrote:

torontostan wrote:

RadioAaron wrote:

TSN's lack of content

What planet do you live on? OneSoccer is the one with a lack of content.

The one where Rogers has the stranglehold on the biggest teams in market #1 and the national rights for the biggest sport in the country.

2023 Revenue: 
TSN: 610M (potentially excludes most NFL revenue)
SN: 848M

2023 pre-tax profit:
TSN: 14%
SN: 10%

You're making it sound like TSN is on par with OneSoccer, when actually they're more profitable than Sportsnet as per CRTC filings. Exclusive NFL, CFL, FIFA, IIHF, NASCAR, F1, Golf, plus regional Jets, Sens & Habs (including RDS), plus half of the Leafs & Raptors leftovers isn't exactly "lack of content" ...... I'd argue Sportsnet has made worse decisions, which have left them with all their eggs in two baskets (Blue Jays performance & NHL overpaying). 

SOWNY » Bryan Adams On Why He Wants To Get Rid of CanCon Regs » Yesterday 1:31 pm

torontostan
Replies: 16

Go to post

paterson1 wrote:

it is doubtful dropping it altogether would make any difference to the ratings and revenue.  And the CRTC likely would never drop cancon altogether...unless it is somehow tied to any new USMCA negotiations. 

Agreed, they will not drop it outright, however I somewhat disagree about ratings & revenue. Any programmer will be able to tell you that, on average, Cancon songs test far worse than non-qualifying songs.... there's certainly a sweet spot that could've worked, however we're about 3x higher than it should be. Better playlist = better perception of the product..... more time people spend with it, the higher the ratings & revenue. If they made these changes 10 years ago, the industry would be in far better shape and they'd have a far greater impact than the same change now.

SOWNY » Bryan Adams On Why He Wants To Get Rid of CanCon Regs » Yesterday 1:28 pm

torontostan
Replies: 16

Go to post

RadioActive wrote:

with stars like Drake and The Weeknd often dominating the charts down south. So it's been a success.

I agree with all of your points.... however it is important not to forget that many songs by those two Canucks do not qualify as cancon.... making the existing regulations even more laughable

SOWNY » How Rogers And The CRTC Are Sidelining Canadian Soccer » Yesterday 10:37 am

torontostan
Replies: 11

Go to post

RadioAaron wrote:

TSN's lack of content

What planet do you live on? OneSoccer is the one with a lack of content.

SOWNY » Bryan Adams On Why He Wants To Get Rid of CanCon Regs » Yesterday 10:33 am

torontostan
Replies: 16

Go to post

Radiowiz wrote:

I argue that ALL radio stations that are close enough to a border should be fully exempt from the Can Con regs so that they can better compete with the American stations that be. 

 

If you're saying that the existence of Cancon regulations harms listenership, then the argument should be that the entire thing be scrapped. Why should the other stations suffer just because they're not a border station?

SOWNY » Breakfast Television slept in?/New hosts revealed » May 7, 2025 11:13 pm

torontostan
Replies: 29

Go to post

He'd be doing this to hopefully get the same 1 week per month at 8am deal that Dina worked out. 

SOWNY » Cdn. NHL Teams Proving A Problem For U.S. Stanley Cup Crews » May 7, 2025 11:11 pm

torontostan
Replies: 28

Go to post

RadioActive wrote:

RadioActive wrote:

So it seems it's not just TNT doing this. It may be a lot closer to home.


 

So let me get this straight - Rogers sends a radio crew to Los Angeles to cover the Jays games there. But they couldn't fork over the dough to send two announcers to Ottawa for the first round of the Leafs playoffs? In what world does this make any sense?

Rogers does not send radio on the road for Blue Jays games either. 

SOWNY » Breakfast Television slept in?/New hosts revealed » May 2, 2025 12:51 pm

torontostan
Replies: 29

Go to post

Someone on here already confirmed that it's true she's barely working there

SOWNY » CHCH Teasing Announcement Friday at 8:40AM » May 2, 2025 9:07 am

torontostan
Replies: 10

Go to post

"Rick Zamperin joins CHCH Morning Live as new co-anchor"

SOWNY » An Interesting Simulcast Dilemma For CTV Tuesday » April 29, 2025 7:36 pm

torontostan
Replies: 6

Go to post

RadioAaron wrote:

paterson1 wrote:

Simsub on regularly scheduled scripted shows is not as important as it use to be, especially a one off like this.  CTV could actually benefit since it will be running Trent at the regular time prior to ABC.  Global ran 60 Minutes at it's regular time yesterday, ahead of CBS which was still covering golf.  Global never did this a few years ago and now it is very frequent. 

They're not running 60 minutes on time because Simsub is less important, they're doing it so it ends on time and the rest of the prime-time lineup can be Simsub'd when applicable.

Global can only do this with new episodes if another CBS affiliate is airing the show at 8pm

SOWNY » Who Gets Your Vote On Monday Night? What To Expect On TV & Radio » April 28, 2025 7:49 pm

torontostan
Replies: 37

Go to post

RadioActive wrote:

Interesting to note that CFRB is taking CTV television audio, while AM640 and Corus are doing dedicated audio-only coverage from Ben O'Hara-Byrne, different from Global.

While CTV has a powerhouse line-up of guests, there is one big advantage to what 640 is doing - the Bell network has the vote totals on the screen indicating who's leading and elected. Which doesn't help much if you happen to be listening on the radio. 

So 0.01% of the audience tonight. 

SOWNY » Cdn. NHL Teams Proving A Problem For U.S. Stanley Cup Crews » April 25, 2025 9:10 pm

torontostan
Replies: 28

Go to post

Easily Amused wrote:

Quite honestly, why wouldn't Rogers make arrangements to get them on the team's transportation? You can 'farm out' or 'remote' some aspects of an away broadcast, but the corporation is cheaping out by not sending two play by play announcers.

Simple, because there are costs involved that are in no way reciprocated by them travelling. It's airfare, it's meals, it's buses, it's hotels, it's equipment and remote staff, and for what? $0 of additional revenue. Never mind also having two additional guys poking around and breathing down your players necks. 

SOWNY » Are AM Stations Authorized To Go HD In Canada? » April 25, 2025 10:26 am

torontostan
Replies: 11

Go to post

This is not what he's talking about. In the U.S. many AM stations are HD-only, and cannot be received on analogue receivers. 

SOWNY » Cdn. NHL Teams Proving A Problem For U.S. Stanley Cup Crews » April 25, 2025 10:24 am

torontostan
Replies: 28

Go to post

Easily Amused wrote:

Is this sarcasm, or are you one of Ted Rogers' grandchildren? 🤔

Not sarcasm.... I'm just the only realist on this forum. I dislike Rogers & Bell as much as the next guy.... but I don't see why the team nor the radio stations should be paying for two guys to travel for the negligible benefit of (maybe) a few thousand people. It's a definite way to lose money. Nobody prefers the radio broadcast, it's only there in cases where you're in the car..... and I'm serious about driving; if they're so juvenile and entitled to think they deserve a place in the visitors arena, why didn't they just drive to Ottawa?

SOWNY » Cdn. NHL Teams Proving A Problem For U.S. Stanley Cup Crews » April 24, 2025 7:00 pm

torontostan
Replies: 28

Go to post

RadioActive wrote:

So it seems it's not just TNT doing this. It may be a lot closer to home.


 

I'm sure they could drive themselves if they wanted to.... 

SOWNY » Cdn. NHL Teams Proving A Problem For U.S. Stanley Cup Crews » April 24, 2025 3:05 pm

torontostan
Replies: 28

Go to post

RadioAaron wrote:

Islanders are (I believe) the first NHL team to end radio-only broadcasts:

https://radioink.com/2025/04/23/new-york-islanders-sweep-clean-their-radio-broadcast-booth/

 

There's quite a few in the NHL..... Islanders, Sabres, Hurricanes, Ducks, Sharks. Can't think of any in the NBA so far...

SOWNY » Cdn. NHL Teams Proving A Problem For U.S. Stanley Cup Crews » April 24, 2025 3:01 pm

torontostan
Replies: 28

Go to post

RadioActive wrote:

torontostan wrote:

RA.... comparing ESPN to local radio crews is laughable. Apples and oranges. 

I don't recall me or the article mentioning ESPN in relation to hockey. True, they cover baseball (although their contract with MLB ends after this season.)

This was about Rogers deciding not to send their radio crews on the road for the Jays. Part of that, as I recall, used COVID as an excuse, but it kept happening even after the pandemic ended.

In either event, sending your crew to cover a live sporting event - regardless of organization - is part of the game, no pun intended. I recall at least one instance when Ben Wagner, who was the play-by-play guy at the time, couldn't call a play on the field because it was out of camera range. He embarrassedly had to admit that on air. Unacceptable on a professional nationwide broadcast regardless of who is doing it. 

Sorry, you indirectly referenced TNT, not ESPN. Even still, playoff radio is a audio medium and its audience would be measured in thousands, playoff TV is a visual medium and its audience would be measured in millions. There's zero justification for continuing to send radio announcers to cover games like it's 1970.... I guarantee you none of them breakeven on the travel & staffing expenses associated with it. If TNT is tight on budget for sending staff, rest assured radio is in the red. The only reason it remains is rights-holders want to please the teams to keep their agreements in place, without it many of these stations would have no selling point to their local advertisers.... and very often the air travel is covered by the team jet, however that will see it's end in the next few years for hockey and basketball if I had to bet... the other reason is bad PR when they do shut it down, being called "cheap" by people who have no idea how to run a business. All that, and to boot... the old white men running teams still think sports radio play by play is relevant... numbers don'

SOWNY » MuchMusic's Live & Interactive Returns With Keith Urban » April 24, 2025 2:54 pm

torontostan
Replies: 8

Go to post

cash wrote:

Such a bad generic singer. 

I don't understand why he sings with a Nashville twang if he's a Kiwi... 

SOWNY » MuchMusic's Live & Interactive Returns With Keith Urban » April 24, 2025 1:11 pm

torontostan
Replies: 8

Go to post

RadioAaron wrote:

Shorty Wave wrote:

This is the first live program announcement from MuchMusic that I have seen in years. All they seem to air these days is back to back episodes of The Simpsons. Boy, Much once was a powerhouse for live performances, loved it back in the day!

MUCH and MuchMusic have become two separate entities.

MUCH is the cable channel th at formerly known at MuchMusic, and now shows almost nothing but Simpsons and Friends repeats.

MuchMusic has been reborn as a Gen Z targeted social media thingy.

This is the first, and oldest-skewing production from MuchMusic I've seen so far to cross back to TV. It's not even airing on MUCH.

and it's not live... see the photo in the release... it was clearly pre-taped 

SOWNY » Cdn. NHL Teams Proving A Problem For U.S. Stanley Cup Crews » April 24, 2025 1:09 pm

torontostan
Replies: 28

Go to post

An American broadcaster sending a production team up to Canada for coverage of an all-Canadian series makes no sense.... I agree with TNT on that point. Interesting that the article doesn't mention if there were any noticeable mistakes as a result of doing their broadcasts remotely.... it seems that viewers are more upset with the concept than they are with the product itself. The "World Feed" approach is undoubtably the method that makes the most sense here... nothing to write home about

RA.... comparing ESPN to local radio crews is laughable. Apples and oranges. 

SOWNY » MuchMusic's Live & Interactive Returns With Keith Urban » April 23, 2025 8:53 pm

torontostan
Replies: 8

Go to post

Famously not what it's named.... try again Paterson

SOWNY » Toronto's Newest Area Code Comes Into Effect This Weekend » April 22, 2025 1:09 pm

torontostan
Replies: 25

Go to post

Radiowiz wrote:

Now there's a good strong point. Too many sources needing a number today. 
However, there are still too many numbers available for use.
I do agree with a comment above that 100,000 numbers are needed immediately, vs ten thousand, however, that still does not explain why one can not have a 416 number if they request it.
(especially a specific number if it is available for use) 

 

A lot of numbers are not available intentionally. If you give up a number, especially post-paid, it is quarantined for months. 416 infrastructure is also much older, so for instance many 416 exchanges are specific to particular buildings, areas, businesses, etc. 416-203 is for the Canadian Forces at Fort York, 416-205 for CBC, 416-341 for SkyDome, 416-808 for Police, and so on... many many more examples of where whole 10,000 number exchanges can't be used because of their intended purpose from the start. Much easier to start a new area code than fix this. 

SOWNY » Toronto's Newest Area Code Comes Into Effect This Weekend » April 22, 2025 12:31 pm

torontostan
Replies: 25

Go to post

eladb wrote:

I don't know even one person with a 437 area code. They've already run out of those?

Binson Echorec wrote:

All those areas were 416 at one time. The 416/905 split was what delineated Toronto from the GTA. 905 has also been split a few times itself.

That is correct. I live in Vaughan. My home phone's area code is 905 now, but was originally a 416 area code. 905 has been split with 289 and I believe 365 as well. 

A lot of non-callable cell network devices (tablets, connected cars....) also require a number 

SOWNY » The Only Toronto OTA Station Not Carrying The English Language Debate » April 15, 2025 5:58 pm

torontostan
Replies: 22

Go to post

Should Sportsnet have to carry it? I think you're more obsessed with the tradition of OTA, rather than what is logical in 2025. 

SOWNY » Is The Word "Radio" Slowly Disappearing From CFRB? » April 7, 2025 5:54 pm

torontostan
Replies: 18

Go to post

Digital "tuning" is quickly catching up (if not already surpassed) AM band tuning for AM talk stations in this country.... it makes sense to promote digital listening over analogue..

SOWNY » Is The Word "Radio" Slowly Disappearing From CFRB? » April 7, 2025 5:52 pm

torontostan
Replies: 18

Go to post

mojo55 wrote:

(thanks to the CRTC)

They're not to blame

SOWNY » The National vs.National Hockey League » April 4, 2025 9:03 am

torontostan
Replies: 11

Go to post

I Used Carts wrote:

torontostan wrote:

 FX hasn't aired a game in years. Sportsnet now has the ability to multiplex their feeds, so using an entertainment channel is bad business now. 

Agree with you though.... people here seem to forget that they do not put all playoff games on CBC anymore.
 

The March 1st Columbus/Detroit stadium game aired on FX just last month, and at least one game of the Vegas/Dallas series last year was there too. So it’s not impossible…

Who knew... my apologies. I can't see Rogers putting a Canadian team on FX.... not that you suggested that. They'd also be limited to about 2 games a week based on their license if I am remembering those rules correctly 

SOWNY » Vista Radio Stations Now On iHeart Canada App » April 3, 2025 3:39 pm

torontostan
Replies: 9

Go to post

Bristol wrote:

Condition of sale in acquiring the stations Bell Media is shedding?

Maybe..... but so far Zoomer & Classical fm are not on iheart... 

SOWNY » Vista Radio Stations Now On iHeart Canada App » April 3, 2025 12:37 pm

torontostan
Replies: 9

Go to post

Scarboroughbluffsradiof99 wrote:

torontostan wrote:

They basically have all the major radio companies except Rogers and CBC.... (Vista, Pattison, Evanov, Corus, and of course Bell)

Not yet.
They don't have golden west, durham, ralco and local radio lab.

I said "basically" and "major" so yes.... I was correct. None of the companies you mentioned are major and most are in very small markets 
 

Board footera