Offline
Meta in the US is getting rid of their fact checkers. In other countries like Canada the fact checkers remain, at least for now. More from CNN...
Offline
Sure, why not. Just TechBros being TechBros. What's the worst that can happen?
Offline
Unfortunately, we are still realizing the consequences of technology; specifically internet and being 'connected all the time' and how it relates to society, scammers, agendas and harm to our children. Meta which is Facebook has been politically compromised for at least a decade and has participated in regime changes. All Social media participated in silencing conversation around Covid for years and colluded with government. As a 51year old, I've experienced life before and after the advent of the internet and as a tech-savvy individual I can interpret things with an appropriate level of skepticism when needed but I am concerned for the current generation and also the seniors today being regularly targeted.
Offline
I think almost anybody can be taken in by false information. I have heard otherwise intelligent and informed people say some really disturbing things that get repeated over and over usually on the internet. Especially if the misinformation is something that they can agree with and it is heard enough times. False information or old inaccurate stories about certain topics become the truth or a fact for many people.
Offline
Constant repetition is how propaganda works. Goebbels knew that quite well: pick your target audience, create a lie or a misrepresentation of the truth, repeat it over and over again to that audience. Get other people to repeat that lie, and eventually even skeptics will begin to believe it. It's critical that you inundate your victim from every corner (TV ads, radio ads, newspaper opinion pieces, guest interviews on podcasts or TV news, social media influencers, Youtubers, etc) with that same lie and eventually a few people will repeat it for you, then their friends who were dubious about the claim will believe it (because now it's coming from a trustworthy source, one of their close friends).
Also, once you can convince them to believe that lie AND make it something that they are emotionally charged about (usually something that makes them angry -- ahem, the "carbon tax causes inflation") then no amount of facts will change their mind about it. That's cognitive dissonance, our brain's refusal to believe that we were wrong about something that we chose to believe is true. The longer they have been believing that lie, the more greater the cognitive dissonance, hence why Trump still has supporters even after four disasterous years as president.
It's extremely easy to propagate a lie thanks to social media which is why fact checkers are so vital to keeping foreign powers and certain political parties, from spreading misinformation. I'm sure that Zuckerberg is trying to appease Trump in doing this, but it's also a cost-saving measure that will cut costs and offer a small boost in profits. Facebook if nothing else, has shown it's more than happy to toss out democracy and the truth, for nice big advertising revenue.
Last edited by TomTV (January 8, 2025 2:14 pm)
Offline
TomTV wrote:
Facebook if nothing else, has shown it's more than happy to toss out democracy and the truth, for nice big advertising revenue.
I largely agree with what you're saying, Tom. But be careful with words like 'democracy' and 'truth'. In a sense, you've fallen victim to the propaganda model you correctly describe. Words like these get repeated often enough, and we're eventually subsumed by them, to the point that even those of us who harbour a healthy skepticism begin to use them without enough due thought.
Democracy can mean different things to different people. It's often a politically loaded and charged word. It's a happy word, a nice word. The Good Guys have democracy, the Bad Guys have something else. We go to war for democracy. The opponent is undemocratic...
Truth is pretty much the same. People say, nowadays, that we're in a post-truth world. Really? Did someone flick the switch and I missed it? There are indeed new challenges to truthfulness and factual accuracy, and modern communications technology has certainly presented new problems and sped up the dissemination of incorrect information. But to say we've tossed out 'the truth' is in itself rather misleading. Even conventional, legacy media have a long history of enabling bad actors to spread fakery. As well, a lot of things that are factually true are also nuanced - more or less factually correct but with a couple noteworthy but difficult-to-detect trouble spots.
Truth and Democracy, and other words such as 'lies' and 'fascist', are loaded and highly politically charged words and are often used when they shouldn't.
Offline
TomTV wrote:
I'm sure that Zuckerberg is trying to appease Trump in doing this, but it's also a cost-saving measure that will cut costs and offer a small boost in profits. Facebook if nothing else, has shown it's more than happy to toss out democracy and the truth, for nice big advertising revenue.
By all accounts these are secondary concerns for him. Zuck and his Tech contemporaries have very different views about civilisation than you or I or almost everyone else. His hand isn't being forced. Like Musk, he is realigning social media the way Union Carbide realigned its Bhopal factory in 84.
Last edited by Chrisphen (January 8, 2025 3:07 pm)
Offline
Apparently, these Tech Bros. believe that Mars is where humanity should reside.
For god's sake, go!