Offline
Although it's technically not under the government's thumb, officials from Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada will give the new-look CRTC a direction they believe the regulator should head in on Monday. Given that Bill C-11 will likely pass sooner than later, this normally dull affair may have a major effect on what you can see and hear over the web in the near future.
Possibly worth keeping an eye on this one.
Government of Canada to announce final direction to the CRTC
Proposed policy direction to the CRTC for competition, affordability, consumer rights and universal access
Offline
So here's what the Industry Minister has instructed the CRTC to do as it sets policy. (Not to be cynical - well, OK, exactly to be cynical - but where have we heard this before?)
Offline
From The Canadian Press:
New federal telecom policy will require CRTC to enact rules to improve competition
Offline
Wonder if the CRTC will force companies like Bell Media to hand back licenses for stations with strong signals like CKOC and CHAM which appear wasted with their current formats, possibly to avoid competition.
Online!
Broodcaster wrote:
Wonder if the CRTC will force companies like Bell Media to hand back licenses for stations with strong signals like CKOC and CHAM which appear wasted with their current formats, possibly to avoid competition.
They will not.
Online!
Broodcaster wrote:
But should it?
Nobody would want them anyway. It wouldn't have any effect.
Offline
It looks like their focus will be on wireless telephony, not radio or TV. Although they will have to implement - and interpret - the provisions of Bill C-11 when it's passed, and that's when the you-know-what may hit the fan.
Online!
Meh.
This has been in my Youtube feed lately. Labeled and segregated. The rest of my feed would be near impossible to inject with Cancon.
There's always a workaround
Offline
RadioAaron wrote:
Broodcaster wrote:
But should it?
Nobody would want them anyway. It wouldn't have any effect.
I disagree. Someone with vision and aiming at an older audience might make those signals work for them as part of a bigger operation. But that would be competition!
Online!
No it wouldn't. The cost of operating a stand-alone AM in such a saturated market cannot be recovered with advertising. As for a bigger operation, there's only Durham and Corus in the market, and an AM doesn't make sense for either.
There will never be another successful English language new AM station.
Offline
Don't forget about the fabulously successful CFAJ 1220 in St. Catharines!
Why. one day, they might even have a sponsor!
Online!
RadioActive wrote:
Don't forget about the fabulously successful CFAJ 1220 in St. Catharines!
Why. one day, they might even have a sponsor!
I'm sure Bell's very concerned about its effects on Move and HTZ!
Offline
Back to the original point in this thread, at least it's a start...
CRTC to Force Big Telcos to Grant Faster Pole Access–to Increase Competition
Offline
I guess those "marching orders" won't have them moving in a straight line. I fear nothing will ever change in this country, despite the endless warnings about fewer choices, more control by the big telcos and endless expense for consumers.
Which leads me to think that the CRTC's true marching music is by K.C. & The Sunshine Band: "That's The Way I Like It."
Canada’s small internet providers — and choice — are dying at the hands of Ottawa and the CRTC
Offline
As a direct result of Rogers being allowed to own Shaw, why doesn't Bell simply buy Telus?
They've talked before, (back in 2007) maybe revisiting the idea will allow for a second monster company?
2007: ,for%20release%20at%20noon%20ET.
Online!
Radiowiz wrote:
As a direct result of Rogers being allowed to own Shaw, why doesn't Bell simply buy Telus?
They've talked before, (back in 2007) maybe revisiting the idea will allow for a second monster company?
2007: ,for%20release%20at%20noon%20ET.
Not a chance that would be allowed. Rogers + Shaw with a Freedom spinoff have very little competitive overlap. Not so much for Bell + Telus.