Offline
The headline in the Canadian Press article says it all:
Corus Entertainment $11.1M first-quarter loss, revenue down 18 per cent
And yet trying to put a good face on it all is the boss. In a press release, CEO John Gosling says this:
"Our first quarter results were in line with our expectations, with persistent market...headwinds and industry conditions continuing to impact both advertising and subscriber revenue...
We are pleased with our significant progress in respect of the proposed recapitalization transaction first announced in November. When completed, the proposed transaction is expected to deliver substantial balance sheet improvements, including reductions of indebtedness and other liabilities of more than $500 million and annual cash interest savings of up to $40 million."
You can see where they lost most of their money last year in the charts on the release below, but it appears TV was the main culprit.
Corus Entertainment Announces Fiscal 2026 First Quarter Results
Offline

RadioActive wrote:
"Our first quarter results were in line with our expectations..."
If at first you don't meet expectations, lower them.
PJ
Offline
In defense of Corus, you wouldn't notice that they were in financial trouble looking at Global or their specialty channels. Even Global News doesn't show less quality even with their financial problems and layoffs.
In terms of radio, AM 640 in many ways seems superior to Newstalk 1010 and overall has a better on air and news line up IMO. I don't listen to Q or the Edge that much so I have no idea if there has been any noticeable change in the two stations since the financial woes began. Locally where I live the four Corus stations sound about the same with AM CJOY still hanging in.
I have watched their two new cable channels, the Home and Flavour Networks. Corus did a much better job launching these two new channels than what Rogers did when they acquired the Food Network and HGTV. And both of the new Corus channels also have a fair amount of original new programming, and have some good shows.
Now all of this may be in vain and the company might fold, but at least so far their problems haven't shown on air to the viewer or listener. And for this they deserve at least some credit.
Offline
paterson1 wrote:
In defense of Corus, you wouldn't notice that they were in financial trouble looking at Global or their specialty channels. Even Global News doesn't show less quality even with their financial problems and layoffs.
In terms of radio, AM 640 in many ways seems superior to Newstalk 1010 and overall has a better on air and news line up IMO. I don't listen to Q or the Edge that much so I have no idea if there has been any noticeable change in the two stations since the financial woes began. Locally where I live the four Corus stations sound about the same with AM CJOY still hanging in.
I have watched their two new cable channels, the Home and Flavour Networks. Corus did a much better job launching these two new channels than what Rogers did when they acquired the Food Network and HGTV. And both of the new Corus channels also have a fair amount of original new programming, and have some good shows.
Now all of this may be in vain and the company might fold, but at least so far their problems haven't shown on air to the viewer or listener. And for this they deserve at least some credit.
I'd agree when it comes to Toronto. Outside of here, it gets dicey. Ottawa, for example, has no local announcers on its FMs. Ditto Kingston, which doesn't even have studios anymore. Morning shows out west are down to single hosts. Websites are outdated messes.
Offline
RadioAaron wrote:
paterson1 wrote:
In defense of Corus, you wouldn't notice that they were in financial trouble looking at Global or their specialty channels. Even Global News doesn't show less quality even with their financial problems and layoffs.
In terms of radio, AM 640 in many ways seems superior to Newstalk 1010 and overall has a better on air and news line up IMO. I don't listen to Q or the Edge that much so I have no idea if there has been any noticeable change in the two stations since the financial woes began. Locally where I live the four Corus stations sound about the same with AM CJOY still hanging in.
I have watched their two new cable channels, the Home and Flavour Networks. Corus did a much better job launching these two new channels than what Rogers did when they acquired the Food Network and HGTV. And both of the new Corus channels also have a fair amount of original new programming, and have some good shows.
Now all of this may be in vain and the company might fold, but at least so far their problems haven't shown on air to the viewer or listener. And for this they deserve at least some credit.I'd agree when it comes to Toronto. Outside of here, it gets dicey. Ottawa, for example, has no local announcers on its FMs. Ditto Kingston, which doesn't even have studios anymore. Morning shows out west are down to single hosts. Websites are outdated messes.
Corus found the money to install an all new computer system for Q 107 and other radio stations that be.
Offline
Radiowiz wrote:
Corus found the money to install an all new computer system for Q 107 and other radio stations that be.
Computers are cheaper than people...
Offline
I love the fact this Canadian Press article seeks to partly shift the blame to the Blue Jays. I suppose there's some truth to it, but what Corus is going through is pretty much the fault of Corus.
Corus revenue slumps in first quarter as Blue Jays help drive TV ad dollars to Rogers
Offline
Corus seems to be acting as if it will always remain in business. I have heard the asks for some of the radio stations are insanely high. One person I know who was trying to negotiate to purchase certain stations was told it was basically all or nothing. Personally, if I were on a sinking ship and someone offered me X millions to bail me out by taking some of the radio stations off my hands, I would jump at it. What concerns me is that they have had offers and they won't sell, and by the time they get to the desperation point where paychecks bounce, or they have to shut things down, they will sell for dirt cheap, and it won't help in the long run. They make it seem like they do ok with TV, so sell the radio division, invest the money into TV, and maybe look to invest in other things to help the bottom line.
Selling the radio division will eliminate those operating expenses, and it will allow the new buyers to program radio the right way. Look at all the former Bell stations and how they sound now. New operators, and the stations all sound better. Even the ones that had no significant format change still sound better. I actually quite like a lot of the Vista stations out west. They are programmed more locally and have a more local sound to them. Also, several stations hired new staff to fill the void of the national programming. It would be good for Corus to finally dump the radio division. Bring Edge back to the glory days under a new owner.
Or Corus can keep running the stations the way they are and see how long they last.
Offline
Campaign Desk wrote:
Radiowiz wrote:
Corus found the money to install an all new computer system for Q 107 and other radio stations that be.
Computers are cheaper than people...
What does this new computer system do that the older one could not do?
Offline
Radiowiz wrote:
Campaign Desk wrote:
Radiowiz wrote:
Corus found the money to install an all new computer system for Q 107 and other radio stations that be.
Computers are cheaper than people...
What does this new computer system do that the older one could not do?
function
Offline
RadioAaron wrote:
Radiowiz wrote:
Campaign Desk wrote:
Computers are cheaper than people...
What does this new computer system do that the older one could not do?
function
The old computer system did not function?? Ads aired, music played...unless smaller markets had some trouble, the Toronto market did not (appear to) deliver a reason for change.
My better guess is they just wanted to be up to date to best make their radio stations appear worth the investment with no technology left behind for the next company to have to invest in.
Last edited by Radiowiz (January 14, 2026 2:05 pm)
Offline
brian451 wrote:
Corus seems to be acting as if it will always remain in business.
Selling the radio division will eliminate those operating expenses, and it will allow the new buyers to program radio the right way. Look at all the former Bell stations and how they sound now. New operators, and the stations all sound better. Even the ones that had no significant format change still sound better. I actually quite like a lot of the Vista stations out west. They are programmed more locally and have a more local sound to them. Also, several stations hired new staff to fill the void of the national programming. It would be good for Corus to finally dump the radio division. Bring Edge back to the glory days under a new owner.
Or Corus can keep running the stations the way they are and see how long they last.
I look at it from the perspective that they don't want to just sell a station here or there to a little guy. (like Bell did)
Instead, maybe they believe a larger company out there would love to have all their radio stations...
Offline
Unlike Bell and Rogers, Corus is a stand alone media company only, so hoping for a new national owener with deep pockets is a nice dream.
But for discussion purposes here, carving it up and selling it to smaller players would be interesting.
I don't think this would happen but having Blackburn buy the radio stations in London like CFPL AM and CFPL FM would be a home coming of sorts. And just maybe they can get them for less then what they sold them for.
Offline
Clearly television division is the monetary problem.Why all the talk about radio.
Offline
paterson1 wrote:
In defense of Corus, you wouldn't notice that they were in financial trouble looking at Global or their specialty channels. Even Global News doesn't show less quality even with their financial problems and layoffs.
I have watched their two new cable channels, the Home and Flavour Networks. Corus did a much better job launching these two new channels than what Rogers did when they acquired the Food Network and HGTV. And both of the new Corus channels also have a fair amount of original new programming, and have some good shows.
Now all of this may be in vain and the company might fold, but at least so far their problems haven't shown on air to the viewer or listener. And for this they deserve at least some credit.
Full disclosure, I worked for Corus a few times over the years doing on-air promos. The one thing that I think Corus has that other broadcasters have seem to have lost is that Corus is proud of their channels, even with things being not so great for them.
They did an amazing job launching the Home and Flavour networks, plus they had to act fast as Rogers had poached Food and HGTV from them, which I still consider a real slime ball move. Rogers did a crap job launching their newly acquired channels mostly because they hadn’t negotiated carriage with Bell etc. You’d think that being in the cable biz, dumbass Rogers would know that type of thing, but they didn’t and really screwed up their launch.
I also worked for Rogers and I can tell you, they do not have them same pride in product that Corus has, it’s just too bad Corus didn’t have the same financial situation!
Offline
Shorty Wave wrote:
paterson1 wrote:
In defense of Corus, you wouldn't notice that they were in financial trouble looking at Global or their specialty channels. Even Global News doesn't show less quality even with their financial problems and layoffs.
I have watched their two new cable channels, the Home and Flavour Networks. Corus did a much better job launching these two new channels than what Rogers did when they acquired the Food Network and HGTV. And both of the new Corus channels also have a fair amount of original new programming, and have some good shows.
Now all of this may be in vain and the company might fold, but at least so far their problems haven't shown on air to the viewer or listener. And for this they deserve at least some credit.
Full disclosure, I worked for Corus a few times over the years doing on-air promos. The one thing that I think Corus has that other broadcasters have seem to have lost is that Corus is proud of their channels, even with things being not so great for them.
They did an amazing job launching the Home and Flavour networks, plus they had to act fast as Rogers had poached Food and HGTV from them, which I still consider a real slime ball move. Rogers did a crap job launching their newly acquired channels mostly because they hadn’t negotiated carriage with Bell etc. You’d think that being in the cable biz, dumbass Rogers would know that type of thing, but they didn’t and really screwed up their launch.
I also worked for Rogers and I can tell you, they do not have them same pride in product that Corus has, it’s just too bad Corus didn’t have the same financial situation!
I have always liked many of their specialty channels and I like that Global shows some of their home improvement and older food programming during the day. Makes up their cancon and the shows are well done, and better than infomercials or another endless rerun. However these shows also have a smaller potential audience since they are more specific and not general entertainment. But if you are a homeowner looking to renovate or enjoy cooking they are of interest.
A few former broadcast friends who worked for Corus were split on the company. A couple didn't like the company and working for them, and a few others liked working for them just fine.
Offline
It seems nothing Corus tries winds up helping the ailing former media titan. Here's the latest chapter in the saga of the company where it seems like it's never business as usual.
Corus to seek court approval for recapitalization deal after vote falls short
Offline
I suppose this is the best they could hope for.
Corus receives court order to proceed with recapitalization transaction
Offline

paterson1 wrote:
I don't listen to Q or the Edge that much so I have no idea if there has been any noticeable change in the two stations since the financial woes began. .
as a rock and roll guys its very apparent, evenings and weekends, they are definitely using the same log on both stations, I've noticed the same song about 15 to 20 minutes apart. first Q then Edge.
Last edited by Cheese2RF (March 25, 2026 1:17 pm)
Offline
The new date to watch for in the ongoing struggle for survival at Corus: April 10th, the day the company's second quarter results are released.
Offline
Cheese2RF wrote:
paterson1 wrote:
I don't listen to Q or the Edge that much so I have no idea if there has been any noticeable change in the two stations since the financial woes began. .
as a rock and roll guys its very apparent, evenings and weekends, they are definitely using the same log on both stations, I've noticed the same song about 15 to 20 minutes apart. first Q then Edge.
I was flipping around the channels while driving a few days ago. Heard “Enjoy the Silence” by Depeche Mode on Edge, and no more than five minutes later heard it on Q.
Offline
There’s some overlap, but definitely not duplicated playlists.
Offline
RadioAaron wrote:
There’s some overlap, but definitely not duplicated playlists.
Perhaps true, but still pathetic.
Offline
Chrisphen wrote:
RadioAaron wrote:
There’s some overlap, but definitely not duplicated playlists.
Perhaps true, but still pathetic.
No it's not.
The stations have had demographics overlap, and therefore some music overlap, for decades. And it has worked brilliantly. Corus sold the "wall of men " (which included 640) while virtually every other music station was targeting women.
The challenge more recently is that Edge has had to move older (because it's a radio station) while Q has had to move younger (because of ad demos) so the overlap is greater. If you have two rock stations where the 90s are a big factor, there's going to be overlap, especially with Cancon.
The only way to avoid it is for one of them to change formats, and Corus can't really do that right now.
Offline
I wonder how many listeners are listening to more than one station so much that they notice... tracks like that serve both markets
Offline
Saul wrote:
I wonder how many listeners are listening to more than one station so much that they notice... tracks like that serve both markets
Q and Edge have 28% audience overlap in 25-54.