Offline

So, the service was costing me ten cents per year. Now they expect me to go out and buy a device and pay for a monthly plan to get a weather alert once or twice a year.
Last edited by turkeytop (March 3, 2026 4:16 pm)
Offline
This isn't radio related, but after this endless and horrible winter, I feel you may need to know this - during a walk this afternoon, I actually saw two robins pecking in the grass where a huge snowbank used to be. So either spring really is on the horizon or else these two birds have really terrible travel agents! Nice to see them back. And no, they don't have access to a Weather Radio, either.
Online!
turkeytop wrote:
So, the service was costing me ten cents per year. Now they expect me to go out and buy a device and pay for a monthly plan to get a weather alert once or twice a year.
And now I'm saving 10¢ a year by its end. Before this thread I wasn't aware this service existed. I wouldn't call that effective. And I would have had to buy a special device to get the alerts anyway so the gripe about having to buy a device now doesn't hold for me.
This is about the most efficient way to reach the most people. Most people have a smartphone, so the focus shifts to that platform. Go where the audience is, not where the audience used to be.
My father had the same insistence on not owing a smartphone even after most of his social circle had converted. He'd be 86 this month, thanks for reminding me of him.
Offline

Enjoy your ten cent tax cut. Don't spend it all in one place.
Online!
RadioActive wrote:
This isn't radio related, but after this endless and horrible winter, I feel you may need to know this - during a walk this afternoon, I actually saw two robins pecking in the grass where a huge snowbank used to be. So either spring really is on the horizon or else these two birds have really terrible travel agents! Nice to see them back. And no, they don't have access to a Weather Radio, either.
This sounds like the kind of morning show chatter I'd hear on Indie 88.
Maybe you should write their show prep! ![]()
Offline
turkeytop wrote:
RadioActive wrote:
This article from the CBC details how the shutdown will work, and contains this statement:
"Environment Canada said operating the network costs about $4 million per year, and the cost to decommission Weatheradio and Hello Weather will be $2.5 million over two years."
Why does it cost $2.5 million to turn something off? Only in government could not doing something cost taxpayers so much money!
Environment Canada to disconnect Weatheradio service this monthSo, $4M/ yr? Whats that? About ten cents per year coming out of the pockets of each of us?
For a huge saving like that, it's worth putting our safety at risk.
You may not be alone in your position. This letter in Radio World tries to point out why this service is still valuable.
"One does not need a crystal ball to see that tornadoes, floods and wildfires will continue to affect Canada, and with these threats comes the specter of death.
When your nearest cell tower, your fiber optic internet connection, your landline phone and your electricity are burned, flooded or blown out, only a radio-based alert signal will be able to get through."
Canada’s Decision to Abandon Weather Radio Is Ill-Advised
Offline
Algonquin Park: Mew Lake/Lake of Two Rivers Campgrounds are served by Weatheradio as "CJNK" 50 w 100.1 FM
CFBK Huntsville and CBC repeater in Whitney are just listenable.
Yes there is minimal cell service but.......
Offline
For a service so few even knew about, it's certainly attracting a lot of attention as it meets its demise on March 16th. This columnist in The Calgary Herald argues shutting down the Weatheradio broadcasts is not only foolish, but dangerous.
Weatheradio Canada must be maintained for public safety, emergency preparedness
Offline
RadioActive wrote:
For a service so few even knew about, it's certainly attracting a lot of attention as it meets its demise on March 16th. This columnist in The Calgary Herald argues shutting down the Weatheradio broadcasts is not only foolish, but dangerous.
Weatheradio Canada must be maintained for public safety, emergency preparedness
Whats dangerous TODAY is the individual not having up to date equipment such as a cell phone. Thats a red-flag on its own. Atop this, I need a special radio to even pick up this weather station which nobody has these days,
Last edited by markow202 (March 9, 2026 10:09 am)
Offline

Looks like the US may be going in the opposite direction making the NOAA radio network more robust.
Looks like the regime in Washington is more concerned about public safety than is the regime in Ottawa.
Last edited by turkeytop (March 10, 2026 12:40 am)
Offline
This livestream may be your last chance to hear Weatheradio if you don't have the special reciever. It's still on the air this morning but is going off the air sometime today:
Last edited by Hansa (Today 6:46 am)
Offline
Ironic timing considering the sheer volume of Special Weather Statements out on Monday.
Online!
RadioActive wrote:
Ironic timing considering the sheer volume of Special Weather Statements out on Monday.
It feels like they issue these "Special Weather Statements" for just about anything these days. They're edging into "boy who cried wolf" territory for me.