sowny.net | The Southern Ontario/WNY Radio-TV Forum


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

November 18, 2025 11:31 am  #1


Technical AM Reception Question

I know that AM signals at the lower end of the AM band travel farther than those at the upper end. WGR's 5000 watt daytime signal goes farther than WWKB's 50,000 watt daytime signal. WNAX operates on 570 in Yankton, SD. Their daytime signal covers all or parts of seven states. I have always wondered why? I suppose I could have called CFRB to ask their chief engineer about this, assuming they still have one. Afterall, they are owned by Bell.

 

November 18, 2025 4:37 pm  #2


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

Basically the higher the frequency the more the ground wave is absorbed into the ground.

 

November 18, 2025 6:48 pm  #3


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

In addition to groundwave propagation, another factor would be whether a frequency is a clear channel frequency under the (old) international agreement.  Some frequencies such as 740 KHz, (CFZM Toronto) have stations licensed as "clear channel" operations.  If you are familiar with the CBC Milton (Hornby) transmitter site the facility is a single-tower, non-directional antenna. (CJBC 860 is also diplexed into that single tower)  CFZM/CJBC do not have multiple towers which if I can use the vernacular "shape" the signal in a particular direction to protect stations elsewhere on the same frequency.  Bottom line, non-directional operations would have better coverage - at the same power as highly directional stations which have to protect other stations on the same frequency in other directions.  CFRB protects WINS 1010 New York City, among other stations.   CFRB has different daytime and night time patters, which also impacts night time skywave radiation.  I hope this is useful. I'm old enough to remember when CFRB had a "manually operated" pattern change.  I worked the board in master control way back when and recall pressing the "pattern change" button.  I believe pattern change at 'RB has been automated for decades.

Last edited by tvguy (November 18, 2025 7:21 pm)

 

November 19, 2025 11:15 am  #4


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

As tvguy mentions 'clear channel stations' are usually non-directional. There are not many other stations on that frequency so they don't have to restrict their signal in certain directions to protect other stations on the same frequency.

Now consider directional stations. Most AM stations are directional to allow other stations to occupy the same frequency. The directional pattern and power level may change from daylight to night time. These stations require much more sophisticated antenna arrays consisting of multiple towers. For example the now silent CJBK 1290 London had 8 towers to direct its signal. Each tower has to have its own tuning unit all connected back to the transmitter. A really good example of a directional array at work would have been 560 CFOS Owen Sound. Imagine a pie with about a 1/4 slice removed. This resembled their pattern. A good signal north, south, east but much less to the west and south west. You could clearly hear CFOS for over 100 miles to the north but it was quite weak in Port Elgin 30 miles away. This was necessary to protect a station in the Detroit area.

One last thing to consider is ground conductivity. This will affect the range of the station. Good ground conductivity will provide better range. The conductivity can also change through the seasons.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_conductivity

 

Last edited by darcyh (November 19, 2025 11:17 am)

 

November 20, 2025 12:45 pm  #5


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

I am well aware of priority clear channels like 740/860 and shared clear channels like 1010/1050 which require different night patterns for protection purposes. I think the first answer summed things up quite succinctly.

     Thread Starter
 

November 20, 2025 12:57 pm  #6


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

WWKB has a horrible night signal in the GTA. It always sounds distorted. Someone told me that we are getting a mix of the daytime ground wave and nighttime skywave signal which causes the distortion. True?

     Thread Starter
 

November 20, 2025 1:29 pm  #7


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

mace wrote:

WWKB has a horrible night signal in the GTA. It always sounds distorted. Someone told me that we are getting a mix of the daytime ground wave and nighttime skywave signal which causes the distortion. True?

I was always sorry about how bad the reception for the former WKBW-AM was here. They were a pioneering Top 40 station with great personalities like Joey Reynolds and Sandy Beach and terrific branding from P.D. Jeff Kaye - and very few of us in Toronto could get it well enough to listen to it. 

It was a truly legendary station back in its day, close to the Southern Ontario border. And yet its signal was aimed the other way and those of us in Toronto could barely hear it clearly. What a shame.
  

 

November 21, 2025 1:48 pm  #8


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

RadioActive wrote:

mace wrote:

WWKB has a horrible night signal in the GTA. It always sounds distorted. Someone told me that we are getting a mix of the daytime ground wave and nighttime skywave signal which causes the distortion. True?

I was always sorry about how bad the reception for the former WKBW-AM was here. They were a pioneering Top 40 station with great personalities like Joey Reynolds and Sandy Beach and terrific branding from P.D. Jeff Kaye - and very few of us in Toronto could get it well enough to listen to it. 

It was a truly legendary station back in its day, close to the Southern Ontario border. And yet its signal was aimed the other way and those of us in Toronto could barely hear it clearly. What a shame.
  

Two important things missing from the KB survey. Last week's position and number of weeks spent on the chart. From 1963 CHUM alays displayed the last week position. Previously, only the top 10 had that information.

     Thread Starter
 

November 21, 2025 2:07 pm  #9


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

That wasn't exactly a real KB chart. It was from the local Buffalo edition of GO Magazine, which was a national paper that was sponsored and given away free by one station in every market. In Buffalo, it was WKBW. In Toronto, it was CHUM. 

Most of the pages were filled with the exact same contemporary music news, while one was given over to the local station to promote themselves. It was given away for free at newsstands and record stores. 

Here's a sample from CHUM in July 1967. 

 

November 21, 2025 2:42 pm  #10


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

RadioActive wrote:

It was a truly legendary station back in its day, close to the Southern Ontario border. And yet its signal was aimed the other way and those of us in Toronto could barely hear it clearly.

Back in the 60s and 70s, I remember receiving a nice, strong signal from 1520 WKBW, every evening. I lived in Oshawa at the time.


"I love the poorly educated."
.......Donald J. tRump
 

November 21, 2025 2:52 pm  #11


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

mace wrote:

WWKB has a horrible night signal in the GTA. It always sounds distorted. Someone told me that we are getting a mix of the daytime ground wave and nighttime skywave signal which causes the distortion. True?

My wife's family would visit relatives in the Gaspé Peninsula sixty odd years ago, and the kids would listen to WKBW in the evenings.

Thirty five years later, I was in Virginia Beach for a wedding, and decided to drive over to see the Norfolk Tides AAA baseball team play.  On the way there, I tuned in 1520 (by now known as WWKB), and heard the play by play of a Buffalo Bisons game.

And there was plenty of evening paid programming buying time on KB in the 90s and 00s, thanks to that nighttime signal pattern.

 

November 21, 2025 4:25 pm  #12


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

Dial Twister wrote:

RadioActive wrote:

It was a truly legendary station back in its day, close to the Southern Ontario border. And yet its signal was aimed the other way and those of us in Toronto could barely hear it clearly.

Back in the 60s and 70s, I remember receiving a nice, strong signal from 1520 WKBW, every evening. I lived in Oshawa at the time.

I'm a bit surprised to hear this, although I think it came in better here in the nighttime than during the day. As a kid, I would always try to get a listenable signal off of 'KB. Never really could and because there were so many other choices - CHUM, CKFH, CKOC, WGR and even WBEN, I never really bothered that often. 

 

November 21, 2025 6:16 pm  #13


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

From what I understand. KB sends their entire night signal eastward to protect KOKC [the former KOMA] in Oklahoma City.  In its top 40 days it had plenty of listeners in the Eastern Canadian provinces and American states.

     Thread Starter
 

November 21, 2025 7:11 pm  #14


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

From BuffaloBroadcasting.org...
(Circa 1964-1966)


"I love the poorly educated."
.......Donald J. tRump
 

November 21, 2025 8:16 pm  #15


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

Doesn't look like the pattern has changed much over the years. There is a null towards Toronto, which I suspect was to protect CHIN 1540.

 

November 24, 2025 9:39 am  #16


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

Evuguy wrote:

Doesn't look like the pattern has changed much over the years. There is a null towards Toronto, which I suspect was to protect CHIN 1540.

I wonder why there is such a significant null to the west during daylight hours?

     Thread Starter
 

November 24, 2025 9:27 pm  #17


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

I suspect they had to protect the now defunct, adjacent 1510 CKOT from Tillsonburg.

 

Yesterday 7:05 am  #18


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

Evuguy wrote:

I suspect they had to protect the now defunct, adjacent 1510 CKOT from Tillsonburg.

Good point. I hadn't thought of that. I wonder why that is still required even though CKOTvacated 1510 years ago. In the CFOS thread, I think someone mentioned that the 560 in Munroe. Mi still has to protect the Owen Sound station even though they are now FM only.

     Thread Starter
 

Yesterday 10:30 am  #19


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

mace wrote:

Evuguy wrote:

I suspect they had to protect the now defunct, adjacent 1510 CKOT from Tillsonburg.

Good point. I hadn't thought of that. I wonder why that is still required even though CKOTvacated 1510 years ago. In the CFOS thread, I think someone mentioned that the 560 in Munroe. Mi still has to protect the Owen Sound station even though they are now FM only.

Correct. The protections remain for now defunct stations. Even if the protections were eliminated and opportunities were available to expand coverage the cost to modify directional antenna arrays would be quite expensive. It is unlikely most stations would spend the money to do so.
 

 

Yesterday 3:55 pm  #20


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

"My back still aches when I hear that word," Stompin' Tom Connors.

 

Yesterday 4:34 pm  #21


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

Actually WKBW moved to 1520 in 1941. CKOT didn't start until 1955, so they weren't actually protected, but did take advantage of the reduced signal in their direction.
It's not unusual for stations sharing clear channels to use the same pattern day and night. The market for WKBW was clearly Buffalo/Niagara and east. Shooting extra signal out over Lake Erie with an omni signal daytime would have been a waste, as well as reducing the signal strength in Buffalo. Being at the high end of the dial, the groundwave signal deterioirates rapidly.
 

 

Yesterday 5:31 pm  #22


Re: Technical AM Reception Question

I grew up in the Owen Sound area. WKBW from Buffalo used to pound in like a local up there during the daytime.


After all is said and done, more is usually said than done.