Online!
And the answer is - no.
To the surprise of absolutely no one, the federal government has refused to reverse a CRTC decision that would quickly lower Internet rates for independent companies that allowed consumers to get web access for less money. It was a story highlighted on SOWNY just two days ago.
The Commission originally had ruled in favour of the smaller guys, hoping to spark competition but then CRTC chair Ian Scott - a former Telus lobbyist - suddenly and inexplicably reversed that edict, forcing prices up and threatening the very existence of the smaller companies.
Some have already thrown in the towel and gone out of business.
It appears the government, however, is trying to buy itself some time from the wrath of what is sure to be angry consumers, even though it was the feds who promised in previous election campaigns to reduce the costs for the average customer.
So how are they planning to fix this mess? They've issued a press release filled with a ton of mumbo jumbo that almost assuredly means they won't - and hope you'll forget. Here are the new marching orders given to the CRTC on Thursday: (Seems odd, since they didn't obey them the last time.)
Online!
The CRTC Theme Song?
Offline
F*ck Trudeau.
Offline
Forward Power wrote:
F*ck Trudeau.
And if it was a conservative in power, nothing would be done either. I say F*ck the voters for falling for the same BS from the same people all the time.
It's time people sent a message... a strong message and send all of these Red and Blue parties packing... Clean house, new ideas.
Online!
While I'm no fan of this Prime Minister for a number of reasons, I actually don't blame him for this. The CRTC is an arm's length entity and does not take direct orders from the government.
The feds can suggest which direction it wants the Commision to go, but is not able to directly order them to do anything. Instead, they suggest policy in the hopes the CRTC will follow it. (Another reason Bill C-11 worries me so much. Putting this bunch in charge of Internet content frankly scares the hell out of me.)
But as long as Ian Scott is the chair, I suspect those requests will go unanswered. His actions while in that office pretty well speak for themselves, constantly seeming to favour giants like Bell and Rogers at the expense - and "expense" is certainly the operative word - of consumers. His record speaks for itself. What it says is not very pretty.
If he told me his first name was "Ian," I would not believe him. That's why I'm concerned that these new marching orders will be either ignored or completely twisted around to once again somehow benefit his good friends at the telcos and cable companies.
I believe the fix is in. And sadly, for the moment at least, I don't think there's any way of fixing that.
Offline
Some of the smaller independent operators have said that they will go out of business or have lost 20-25% of their customers since they had to raise rates. How much did monthly bills actually go up on average? I thought I read one operator mentioned months ago that they would need to increase the average invoice by $3 per month.
How much were their customers paying per month in the first place? Also for comparable service, how do the prices stack up to the conglomerates? Prices from the smaller operators are lower but by how much? If the price difference is that dramatic for the same services, why have more people not moved to the independents over the years?
Offline
Well, the chairperson and vice-chairperson's jobs are up for grabs:
Online!
The reaction from the independent providers is pretty predictable. They're not happy about the decision to leave the rates alone, but at least one of them believes there may finally be some progress in the area of pricing, fairness and competition - but even they admit it's still a long way off.
Smaller telecoms cautious on Ottawa’s new CRTC policy directives
Offline
paterson1 wrote:
How much were their customers paying per month in the first place?
I was a Teksavvy customer for 5 years. I had a "lite" internet service, primarily used as a security monitoring connection on a house.
It was the cheapest service I could find (5Mb/down & 1Mb/s up). The big boys did not even offer such a basic service. It used the Rogers coaxial backbone.
I was initially paying $24.95/mo which was "OK" for this small bit of bandwidth.
The rate went up to $34.95/mo (40% increase) after the CRTC decision reversal.
So much for lowering internet costs.