sowny.net | The Southern Ontario/WNY Radio-TV Forum


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

Today 4:34 pm  #1


Should There Be A Law Against Taking Some Major Sports Off Free TV?

One group thinks so. The Friends of Canadian Media is suggesting certain events are so important to Canada's cultural identity that to take them off so-called "free media" should not be allowed. The campaign has been spurred by the recent announcement that there will no longer be any way to see an NHL game - regular season but especially playoff - without having to fork out a small fortune to a company like Rogers.

As the article below outlines, many countries actually have rules like that in place. And the Friends believe it should apply to the NHL in Canada. 

“The issue isn’t whether Rogers has a legal right to negotiate these deals. Of course they do,” (spokesman Raj Shoan) added. “The question is whether Canada’s broadcast policy should continue to guarantee some measure of public access to events that have some sort of cultural value, public value over and above their commercial value.” 

If that name sounds even remotely familiar, it's because Shoan was once a controversial CRTC Commissioner, who regularly had disagreements with his fellow members. He believes the government could work out a way that would restore at least some games to free TV, without compromising Rogers ability to sell or keep the rights to whomever it wants.

But they shouldn't shut out Canadians who either won't - or can't - afford to pay some outrageous rates for what they used to get free. 

No NHL games on free Canadian TV? This group thinks there should be a law against that

 

Today 7:19 pm  #2


Re: Should There Be A Law Against Taking Some Major Sports Off Free TV?

Yes.
Hockey should be protected.
Same with baceball.
Hockey should have stayed on the CBC, the cbc has national reach.
And instead of rogers, The CBC should have gave the rights to bell, if they want to take hockey off the cbc, if they put it on ctv, they will still get national reach even in some northern communities in ontario.
But, the cbc has the largest reach, so the cbc and rogers should have kepped hockey night in Canada.

Last edited by Scarboroughbluffsradiof99 (Today 7:20 pm)

 

Today 8:18 pm  #3


Re: Should There Be A Law Against Taking Some Major Sports Off Free TV?

Scarboroughbluffsradiof99 wrote:

And instead of rogers, The CBC should have gave the rights to bell, if they want to take hockey off the cbc, if they put it on ctv, they will still get national reach even in some northern communities in ontario.
But, the cbc has the largest reach, so the cbc and rogers should have kepped hockey night in Canada.

It wasn't up to the CBC. They essentially "rented" the games from Rogers in a long term agreement that finally ran out. Rogers owns the Leafs and the rights to the games, so they could do what they want. That would never include selling anything to Bell. 

     •Thread Starter
 

Today 8:59 pm  #4


Re: Should There Be A Law Against Taking Some Major Sports Off Free TV?

NO


After all is said and done, more is usually said than done.
 

Today 9:26 pm  #5


Re: Should There Be A Law Against Taking Some Major Sports Off Free TV?

For the vast majority of viewers, the NHL hasn't been on "free" TV for decades. 

 

Today 10:59 pm  #6


Re: Should There Be A Law Against Taking Some Major Sports Off Free TV?

 For customers who do not have a television subscription, Sportsnet+ is available directly for $34.99 monthly. (Sportsnet says it is working with other distributors to make Sportsnet+ available without an upgrade, but negotiations over such fees among competitors rarely go smoothly.)


https://nationalpost.com/opinion/scott-stinson-what-channel-is-the-hockey-on-the-nhl-is-back-and-watching-it-is-more-expensive-than-ever

 

Today 11:05 pm  #7


Re: Should There Be A Law Against Taking Some Major Sports Off Free TV?

cash wrote:

 For customers who do not have a television subscription, Sportsnet+ is available directly for $34.99 monthly. (Sportsnet says it is working with other distributors to make Sportsnet+ available without an upgrade, but negotiations over such fees among competitors rarely go smoothly.)


https://nationalpost.com/opinion/scott-stinson-what-channel-is-the-hockey-on-the-nhl-is-back-and-watching-it-is-more-expensive-than-ever

If you can't fully connect to the story, try this link.

     •Thread Starter