Offline
cash wrote:
I guess they need the cash
From the article: "for a telecom giant, it’s a safe investment… but not an essential one, because it’s not excessively profitable either."
So they "could sell" (as the article suggests in the subject line)
That's "Could sell" not will sell.
Offline
Radiowiz wrote:
cash wrote:
I guess they need the cash
From the article: "for a telecom giant, it’s a safe investment… but not an essential one, because it’s not excessively profitable either."
So they "could sell" (as the article suggests in the subject line)
That's "Could sell" not will sell.
They wouldn't put this out there if they weren't interested in selling/.
Offline
cash wrote:
Radiowiz wrote:
cash wrote:
I guess they need the cash
From the article: "for a telecom giant, it’s a safe investment… but not an essential one, because it’s not excessively profitable either."
So they "could sell" (as the article suggests in the subject line)
That's "Could sell" not will sell.They wouldn't put this out there if they weren't interested in selling/.
For now, we're talking about a possibility, not a certainty. That's an important distinction to make.
Offline
It wouldn’t surprise me if Rogers went for it, they like to be playas! Now if they could only find a buyer for Citytv (allegedly).