sowny.net | The Southern Ontario/WNY Radio-TV Forum


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

Today 6:37 am  #1


Beware Of Ridiculous TV Antenna Claims

This story appears to be from a religious-based website in B.C., but it has nothing to do with faith. Unless you're putting that faith in some increasingly outrageous claims about what an HDTV antenna can pull in. 

"This brings us to the antennas being sold in the local big box stores, and also often available at negligible cost on the Facebook Marketplace. These smaller antennas are meant to be attached to windows, and they are usually accompanied by outlandish claims about their capabilities. To be sure, they will pull in any reasonably close local stations broadcasting over the air, but to have stickers on them showing cable-only services, such as CNN, TSN, BBC, etc., is simply misleading and wrong."

"...Then there is the claim about distance. Look at the image accompanying this column. It’s for a $20 antenna, second-hand. An outlandish claim of 2200+ mile long range! That really would be amazing if it were indeed possible. Los Angeles is barely a thousand miles from Vancouver. I could be watching those police car chases on KTLA without the need of a cable TV subscription! It’s pure nonsense, of course."


I still prefer a rotor at a decent height on a proper antenna mast, although I'm aware not everyone can have that set-up.

The TV antenna's swan song

 

Today 10:05 am  #2


Re: Beware Of Ridiculous TV Antenna Claims

Remember the 'device' that you plugged into an electric outlet that turned your house wiring into a giant TV antenna. Trouble was house wiring is is not anyway near the right length to pick up TV signals. These devices came and went and always performed poorly.

 

Today 12:54 pm  #3


Re: Beware Of Ridiculous TV Antenna Claims

Why the heck would anyone waste money on a silly little antenna when you could get a Nuclear Sub for $7 !! : )) .. 

 

Today 1:01 pm  #4


Re: Beware Of Ridiculous TV Antenna Claims

My husband and I have had a rooftop antenna for 13 years. When he went to Save and Replay in Mississauga to buy it, he was looking at an antenna of a particular height (I can’t remember how big it was). The salesperson said that we would be able to get channels from Algonquin Park with that size antenna 😄 So we went with the one that gets the Toronto channels and several from WNY as well.

 

Today 1:06 pm  #5


Re: Beware Of Ridiculous TV Antenna Claims

g121 wrote:

Why the heck would anyone waste money on a silly little antenna when you could get a Nuclear Sub for $7 !! : )) .. 

I'm still waiting for my X-Ray specs and my sea-monkeys. Only decades overdue, but I'm sure they'll be coming eventually. 


     •Thread Starter
 

Today 1:08 pm  #6


Re: Beware Of Ridiculous TV Antenna Claims

Capricasix wrote:

My husband and I have had a rooftop antenna for 13 years. When he went to Save and Replay in Mississauga to buy it, he was looking at an antenna of a particular height (I can’t remember how big it was). The salesperson said that we would be able to get channels from Algonquin Park with that size antenna 😄 So we went with the one that gets the Toronto channels and several from WNY as well.

How was that Algonquin Park TV? I hear you can't see the forest for the trees. 

I bought some stuff from Save & Replay. Are they still in business?

     •Thread Starter
 

Today 2:05 pm  #7


Re: Beware Of Ridiculous TV Antenna Claims

When we moved into our last family home near Peterborough in the early '90s, it included a big VHF-only amplified antenna on a rotor. With the amplifier powered on, nearby CHEX (ch. 12) would overload the TV, so if we wanted to watch that station, we'd need to unplug the amp, but everything else was fine with the amp on. Regulars for us were CKVR 3, CBLT 5, and CFTO 9, and very often Global on channel 7 from the Midland/Muskoka transmitter. Sometimes we could pick up the Rochester VHFs - WROC 8 (CBS), WHEC 10 (NBC), and WOKR 13 (ABC).

As of the mid '90s, there were five "local" OTA TV signals in the Peterborough area, four of which were on UHF, and we'd pick up the UHFs with rabbit ears. The lone VHF was CHEX on 12, and on UHF we had TVO on 18, Global on 27, Radio-Canada on 44, and CFTO on its then-new channel 54 rebroadcaster near Bobcaygeon. TVO and R-C came from the CBC FM tower near the south shore of Rice Lake, and Global from Alnwick Hill, north of Cobourg, shared with CFMX-FM 103.1.

 

Today 7:57 pm  #8


Re: Beware Of Ridiculous TV Antenna Claims

I am a member of a Facebook group that deals with OTA reception and the best type of antenna to invest in. Most of the members are pretty knowledgeable and many are or were antenna installers. Yes the 1000 mile reception claims occasionally surface there too.