Offline
It's now lost to history and collectors like yours truly, but on August 11, 1976, the 1,000th edition of the iconic CHUM Chart was released. Both the CHUM many of us knew and the charts themselves are long gone, but on that summer day half a century ago, the Toronto Sun thought it was important enough to do an article on it, including having reporter Jerry Gladman dress up as typical 50s teenager in a classic pic for the story.
By that time, of course, the Sun was the only place to see this remarkable chart, with CHUM having long since discontinued printing them anywhere but in the pages of the newspaper itself. I'm not sure how long they lasted in that format, but what is now TSN1050 is a shadow of its former 60s hit music station, generally coming in near the bottom of the ratings.
How the mighty have fallen.
So what was #1 in edition 1,000? Take a look for yourself.

Offline
Lots of schlock on the CHUM 30 fifty years ago today! ![]()
Offline
For collectors, lots of old CHUM charts on ebay..Chum Charts for sale | eBay
Offline

RadioActive wrote:
It's now lost to history and collectors like yours truly, but on August 11, 1976, the 1,000th edition of the iconic CHUM Chart was released. Both the CHUM many of us knew and the charts themselves are long gone, but on that summer day half a century ago, the Toronto Sun thought it was important enough to do an article on it, including having reporter Jerry Gladman dress up as typical 50s teenager in a classic pic for the story.
By that time, of course, the Sun was the only place to see this remarkable chart, with CHUM having long since discontinued printing them anywhere but in the pages of the newspaper itself. I'm not sure how long they lasted in that format, but what is now TSN1050 is a shadow of its former 60s hit music station, generally coming in near the bottom of the ratings.
How the mighty have fallen.
So what was #1 in edition 1,000? Take a look for yourself.![]()
In Ron Hall's "The CHUM Chart Book", the author mentions that the issue numbers were five behind the actual total, an error that was never corrected and continued until the last chart. So this is Official Issue #995.
Offline
One thing I noticed. seven songs were on the chart for a minimum of ten weeks. Back in 1968/69. a song rarely lasted more than nine weeks on the chart. One of the exceptions was Hey Jude which lasted eleven weeks. However seven of those weeks were at #1. So it climbed and fell pretty quickly.