Radiowiz wrote:
DOPEfm wrote:
The scam (or at least, that's my take...) is that you need to have the same companies internet. (Can't have rogers internet + telus tv, for example). In a truly competitive market, this wouldn't be allowed.
Think back, if you had a bell phone, you didn't have to have their internet to have that service. Then, you had better leverage of choice (at least for internet).
Cable TVs always been a service area, so that's never changed.
I agree 100%, but I also love the idea of just ONE bill. It's very nice not having to worry about each service's bill cycle and have to worry about whether or not each bill has been paid on time. (easy to forget a bill)
HOWEVER I also very much agree with the freedom of true choice, and the freedom to not be forced to have one company for two or more services.
Thing is, if you have Rogers for internet, and Telus for TV, it's too easy to have something go very wrong and they (Telus) will just say it's a Rogers problem, while Rogers will try to say it's a Telus problem...
My take is on networks, they all share on each other at some juncture or another.
With separate service choice, the bills drop to stay competitive. This 'bundling' is another so said scam.
These broadcast/cable/etc companies make huge profits off of these tactics such as uncompetitive services. Then blow it on naming things and spending in the most egregious and irresponsible ways. You and I should have our names on something by now as we funded it. Wasteful for the wealthy.
Anyways, back to TV, make the system truly competitive. Android boxes and other work arounds are costing them and again, you and I pay more for that customer loss.
Perhaps Telus TV quality and line-up may be better, but god forbid, I'll never know, I'm in a Rogers serviced area. Blows my mind man.
Thank you and goodnight y'all.
👏🎶🎧🎶👏
We'll speak again (Sat/Sun eves on AM + Sat overnights on FM)
Till then friends....