The Southern Ontario/WNY Radio-TV Forum » Looks like Mauler and Rush are in the Derringer camp?

RadioQuiz · May 27, 2022 2:58 pm

This is quite a read? Will more come out? Some disturbing accusations for sure.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ottawa/comments/uytv1w/mauler_and_rush_of_hot_899_are_total_scumbags/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

May 27, 2022 5:47 pm

The entire story is on her Fbook page here...

https://www.facebook.com/lauramainellapublicfigure/posts/pfbid0D1pf4WqVrwfTZze8LGF9NPaHuRJ8JTYVEGDpYniwCYJzhd6tKtr8GBMB46SVm7Vvl

Paul Jeffries · May 27, 2022 8:11 pm

Sadly, we're probably going to see many more stories like this surface in the weeks and months ahead.

PJ

Tomas Barlow · May 28, 2022 8:02 am

Without saying something that could get me in trouble, I sincerely hope that when this one is investigated the history of BOTH sides is looked at going back many years.

I have no reason to doubt this story but the entire diary should be read.

brian451 · May 28, 2022 1:40 pm

I have heard so many things over the years. There will be more at Corus. And I am sure more in other places too. It’s sad. What’s more sad is it took this long for it to come out. Juan Gomeshi was 4-5 years ago if I recall and I expected a lot more to come out then. It’s a shame that these things keep happening

RadioAaron · May 28, 2022 1:47 pm

Tomas Barlow wrote:
Without saying something that could get me in trouble, I sincerely hope that when this one is investigated the history of BOTH sides is looked at going back many years.

I have no reason to doubt this story but the entire diary should be read.

YUP

craignucks · June 1, 2022 9:14 pm

RadioAaron wrote:
Tomas Barlow wrote:
Without saying something that could get me in trouble, I sincerely hope that when this one is investigated the history of BOTH sides is looked at going back many years.

I have no reason to doubt this story but the entire diary should be read.
YUP

=12pxSo you're saying the alleged physical violence was justified?

Tomas Barlow · June 3, 2022 12:58 am

craignucks wrote:
RadioAaron wrote:
Tomas Barlow wrote:
Without saying something that could get me in trouble, I sincerely hope that when this one is investigated the history of BOTH sides is looked at going back many years.

I have no reason to doubt this story but the entire diary should be read.
YUP

=12pxSo you're saying the alleged physical violence was justified?

No. I did not say that at all.
However I strongly suspect that you won't see many, if any, former colleagues offer public support for this individual.

Tomas Barlow · June 3, 2022 2:36 pm

craignucks wrote:
Tomas Barlow wrote:
craignucks wrote:

=12pxSo you're saying the alleged physical violence was justified?
No. I did not say that at all.
However I strongly suspect that you won't see many, if any, former colleagues offer public support for this individual.
You appear to be suggesting the victim was tremendously unpopular with former colleagues. How does your presumption correlate with the physical violence imposed upon the victim in the workplace?

Alleged physical violence. An allegation doesn’t automatically make something true. If no one offers any support it says something about whether the other people in the workplace find the complaint or complainant credible.

craignucks · June 3, 2022 8:37 pm

Tomas Barlow wrote:
Alleged physical violence. An allegation doesn’t automatically make something true. If no one offers any support it says something about whether the other people in the workplace find the complaint or complainant credible.

A false allegation would constitute libel. Would a defamed party not immediately seek legal remedy to protect his reputation and lucrative career?

As we've learned from the allegations surrounding Q107, public silence from colleagues is an indicator of nothing.

Tomas Barlow · June 4, 2022 12:36 am

You've convicted them but I haven't. I have reasons for why I believe what I believe. That is all.

craignucks · June 4, 2022 7:13 pm

Tomas Barlow wrote:
You've convicted them but I haven't. I have reasons for why I believe what I believe. That is all.

You have it on good authority that there is no substance to Ms. Mainella's allegations of mistreatment and physical violence?

Tomas Barlow · June 5, 2022 2:06 am

craignucks wrote:
Tomas Barlow wrote:
You've convicted them but I haven't. I have reasons for why I believe what I believe. That is all.
You have it on good authority that there is no substance to Ms. Mainella's allegations of mistreatment and physical violence?

I didn't write that. In fact, I said above that I have no reason not to believe it. I have a personal opinion which I have expressed. That is all. Do you have it on good authority that there IS substance to Ms. Mainella's allegations of mistreatment and physical violence? You must, because you're repeatedly asking the same question with different wording.

Last edited by Tomas Barlow (June 5, 2022 2:21 am)