1 of 1- RadioActive
- Moderator
Offline 
The CRTC Needed A Study For This?
Whatever amount of taxpayer money they spent on this ($250,000) was too much...
CRTC says 55 and older likely to get news from TV; 45 and under from internet
- paterson1
- Member
Offline
Re: The CRTC Needed A Study For This?
RadioActive wrote:
Whatever amount of taxpayer money they spent on this ($250,000) was too much...
CRTC says 55 and older likely to get news from TV; 45 and under from internet
It's important to get Canadian data and information rather than everything coming out of California or NY....
- RadioActive
- Moderator
Offline
Re: The CRTC Needed A Study For This?
Whatever amount of taxpayer money they spent on this ($250,000) was too much...
CRTC says 55 and older likely to get news from TV; 45 and under from internetIt's important to get Canadian data and information rather than everything coming out of California or NY....
My point is I could have told you this for half the price - or even for free!
- •
Thread Starter- paterson1
- Member
Offline
Re: The CRTC Needed A Study For This?
Free doesn't mean a thing if it is just a guess...
- RadioAaron
- Member
Offline
Re: The CRTC Needed A Study For This?
Free doesn't mean a thing if it is just a guess...
There's no guessing involved, but you still need to do the study to justify whatever action you're going to take. It's cover for when things inevitably go sideways.
- Shorty Wave
- Member
Offline
Re: The CRTC Needed A Study For This?
Joke. Our tax dollars in action plus I think this is a fairly apparent situation, although I don’t quite fit the demos as I get my news from several sources, including an old school newspaper thrown in for good measure!