sowny.net | The Southern Ontario/WNY Radio-TV Forum


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

May 18, 2026 6:18 am  #1


This Idea Is Terrible. Would Bell & Rogers Consider It?

This isn't about broadcasting per se, but it's such a terrible idea, I can just see Bell & Rogers drooling in anticipation and wondering "why didn't we think of that?" Let's hope they don't. 

A New Zealand telco recently completed an experimental campaign that - wait for it - plays ads right before people are connected durng a phone call. It appears the idea was to reduce user's bills, but it's such an intrusive interruption that it would likely infuriate most of us. Still, you didn't have to hear the spot.

"Both the caller and recipient had to opt in for the ad, and the consent applied to only one call at a time..."

But according to local advertising exec. Vaughan Davis, a surprising number of people agreed to listen. 

“You’re already used to having your music interrupted with ads, and often those ads are for Spotify, so you can imagine someone in an ad agency saying, ‘what if we did that for phone calls?’

"...“There will be people who think, ‘instead of paying $40 a month, I’ll pay $5 and tolerate ads.’ There could be a legitimate business model there.”


Yikes! Please Kiwis - don't give the greedmongers at Bell and Rogers any bad ideas. They already have enough of them.


Skinny phone call ads: Why the telco tried a ‘dystopian’ campaign

 

May 18, 2026 7:13 am  #2


Re: This Idea Is Terrible. Would Bell & Rogers Consider It?

It shouldn't stop there.
How about an ad before one can start texting anyone? That makes good logic with the Gen Z's and younger Millennials, since they tend to text more than talk these days, it seems...   


CityNews 24/7: https://toronto.citynews.ca/video/
RadioWiz & RadioQuiz are NOT the same person. 
RadioWiz & THE Wiz are NOT the same person.

 
 

May 18, 2026 7:40 am  #3


Re: This Idea Is Terrible. Would Bell & Rogers Consider It?

RadioActive wrote:

This isn't about broadcasting per se, but it's such a terrible idea, I can just see Bell & Rogers drooling in anticipation and wondering "why didn't we think of that?" Let's hope they don't. 

A New Zealand telco recently completed an experimental campaign that - wait for it - plays ads right before people are connected durng a phone call. It appears the idea was to reduce user's bills, but it's such an intrusive interruption that it would likely infuriate most of us. Still, you didn't have to hear the spot.

"...“There will be people who think, ‘instead of paying $40 a month, I’ll pay $5 and tolerate ads.’ There could be a legitimate business model there.”[/i][/b]


Skinny phone call ads: Why the telco tried a ‘dystopian’ campaign

 
The one problem I see with this is that Bell & Rogers would run the ads but still charge customers close to full service charges. They wouldn’t take much of a haircut if they control it and the consumer would end up with ads and little if any savings. Don’t go into the light!