Where's Travis Dhanraj?

Skip to: New Posts  Last Post
Page:  Next »
Posted by Chrisphen
February 18, 2025 8:01 pm
#2

Where's Linda Leatherdale's byline-stealing ass? Oh wait - the Sun isn't saying.

 
Posted by mace
February 18, 2025 11:18 pm
#3

Bottom line. CBC believes in diversity for women/visible minorities etc. providing they don't have a conservative point of view.

 
Posted by paterson1
February 19, 2025 9:26 am
#4

That's odd, I never considered Travis Dhanraj to be on the conservative side of the spectrum.  When he was at Global News and when he did some reporting for AM640/Q107 I always thought he was pretty rough on Doug Ford and the conservatives during COVID.  In fact during the COVID press conferences at times he seemed almost hostile to Ford.  He also gave Patrick Brown grief when he was leader of the PC's. 

I didn't watch his Canada Tonight show much on CBC News Channel and overall I wasn't really that impressed with either him or the show.  Topics he was covering and his guests didn't really interest me that much whenever I took the time to watch.  Maybe ratings for his program were not good?

Ian Hanomansing to me is a better choice for 8pm timeslot on the network.  Ian seems to me to be fair and usually right up the middle in his style.

If he sues CBC, it will be interesting to see what he says, and if CBC was trying to direct him to have a certain position in his reporting and interviews.

 

 
Posted by Scarboroughbluffsradiof99
February 19, 2025 12:31 pm
#5

mace wrote:

Bottom line. CBC believes in diversity for women/visible minorities etc. providing they don't have a conservative point of view.

That's how left the CBC has gotten.
I will miss travis.
I hope bell takes him on for ither newstalk 1010 or CTV news.
He was good on cp24

 
Posted by Scarboroughbluffsradiof99
February 19, 2025 12:34 pm
#6

paterson1 wrote:

That's odd, I never considered Travis Dhanraj to be on the conservative side of the spectrum.  When he was at Global News and when he did some reporting for AM640/Q107 I always thought he was pretty rough on Doug Ford and the conservatives during COVID.  In fact during the COVID press conferences at times he seemed almost hostile to Ford.  He also gave Patrick Brown grief when he was leader of the PC's. 

I didn't watch his Canada Tonight show much on CBC News Channel and overall I wasn't really that impressed with either him or the show.  Topics he was covering and his guests didn't really interest me that much whenever I took the time to watch.  Maybe ratings for his program were not good?

Ian Hanomansing to me is a better choice for 8pm timeslot on the network.  Ian seems to me to be fair and usually right up the middle in his style.

If he sues CBC, it will be interesting to see what he says, and if CBC was trying to direct him to have a certain position in his reporting and interviews.

 

Travis was not far-left for trudeau's CBC.
Lets hope Canada tonight servives.

 
Posted by RadioActive
February 20, 2025 7:50 am
#7
 
Posted by 67GreenRambler
July 7, 2025 11:59 am
#8

He's gone. What a garbage organization the CBC is.

Former CBC top host, Travis Dhanraj, calls CBC “A place where asking hard questions - about tokenism masquerading as diversity, problematic political coverage protocols, and the erosion of editorial independence - became a career-ending move."

 
Posted by Radiowiz
July 7, 2025 12:54 pm
#9

67GreenRambler wrote:

He's gone. What a garbage organization the CBC is.

Meh. CBC is great. I love their Marketplace program. It's produced well, and well worth watching.
 
It would seem I never watch CBC news Network, so maybe that's garbage, not  CBC itself...


 
 

Last edited by Radiowiz (July 7, 2025 12:57 pm)


CityNews 24/7: https://toronto.citynews.ca/video/
RadioWiz & RadioQuiz are NOT the same person. 
RadioWiz & THE Wiz are NOT the same person.

 
 
Posted by paterson1
July 7, 2025 1:32 pm
#10

Ian Hanomansing's program is much better than Canada Tonight with Travis Dhanraj.  A better program and  host IMO. 

 
Posted by Binson Echorec
July 7, 2025 2:07 pm
#11

paterson1 wrote:

A better program and  host IMO. 

I don't know if it's a better show but agreed on the better host part. Dhanraj at least had a studio, Hanomansing broadcasts from the middle of the office space - it's a weird look for the guy who was rumoured to be the one to take over from Peter.
 

 
Posted by ED1
July 7, 2025 2:16 pm
#12

Binson Echorec wrote:

paterson1 wrote:

A better program and  host IMO. 

I don't know if it's a better show but agreed on the better host part. Dhanraj at least had a studio, Hanomansing broadcasts from the middle of the office space - it's a weird look for the guy who was rumoured to be the one to take over from Peter.
 

Ian Hanomansing should have been Peter Mansbridge’s replacement from the beginning. However, having Adrienne Arsenault as the solo anchor instead of the 3 or 4 anchor rotation they had is much better, and she’s an excellent presenter in her own right.

I wonder if Ian Hanomansing even wanted to leave Vancouver for that gig. Also wonder if it weren’t for whatever pension plan CBC has for him when he retires, he would have jumped ship to Global National when Kevin Newman left.

Also IIRC the timeslot that CBCNN’s Canada Tonight was in was Ian’s old timeslot when he anchored CBCNN from Vancouver. He just happens to have returned to his old timeslot.

Last edited by ED1 (July 7, 2025 2:18 pm)

 
Posted by RadioActive
July 7, 2025 2:55 pm
#13

Still a lot of mystery surrounding this, but this is from the Toronto Star:

"Kathryn Marshall, Dhanraj’s lawyer, said CBC presented Dhanraj with an “ultimatum that was so unconscionable and morally wrong, there was no way he was going to say yes.” She declined to share more details.

Dhanraj had made a series of complaints about CBC’s culture, Marshall said, including of “toxic, bullying (and) malicious” behaviour by a “small circle of senior Ottawa-based journalists.”

Dhanraj plans to file a complaint to the Canadian Human Rights Commission, Marshall added."

Ex-CBC host Travis Dhanraj says he was ‘forced to resign,’ slams public broadcaster in all-staff email

 
Posted by RadioActive
July 7, 2025 3:04 pm
#14

An open letter from Dhanraj. Talk about a) standing up for your beliefs and b) throwing your career away. Who would hire him now?


 
Posted by Centerline
July 7, 2025 3:17 pm
#15
Posted by VS.TO.
July 7, 2025 3:53 pm
#16

As far as I know, Ian Hanomansing  has not brought on far right conspiracy theorists like Brian Lilley and Lara Trump.  Sure be Conservative but if you bring on people like this on,  maybe Rebel News is more suitable for Travis. 

Last edited by VS.TO. (July 7, 2025 3:53 pm)

 
Posted by Dparker
July 7, 2025 4:24 pm
#17

VS.TO. wrote:

As far as I know, Ian Hanomansing  has not brought on far right conspiracy theorists like Brian Lilley and Lara Trump.  Sure be Conservative but if you bring on people like this on,  maybe Rebel News is more suitable for Travis. 

 

I don't think Travis is far right - what he was trying to do was to make sure that all the political parties had a say.  Sometime you need to hear the opinion of people you don't like and by having them on his show is in no way supporting them - it's about journalism and discourse 
 

 
Posted by newsguy1
July 7, 2025 5:24 pm
#18

There's airing people whose views you don't like, and then there's airing views of people everybody already knows has odious views.
That is not fair journalism, that is just putting on obnoxious people whose views are already well known by most people.
People like Brian Lilley or Laura Trump already have their audiences and their supporters.
They know where to go to get their "fix" of their favorite commentators.
The CBC does not have to do them any favors by bringing them on to appear to be "fair"
And puh-leez, Danrahj's line "They Tried to Crush Me But I'm Still Standing," 
What a laughable victim's complex.
Nobody cares man.
You're not Nelson F%$#& Mandela.

 

 

 
Posted by 67GreenRambler
July 10, 2025 9:04 am
#19

Some insight to the repressive tolerance culture in practice at the Corpse that ended Travis Dhanraj's career.

It is pay walled but 12ft.io will get you there.

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/julia-malott-i-am-the-wrong-kind-of-transwoman-for-cbc-travis-dhanraj-made-me-a-regular

 
Posted by RadioActive
July 13, 2025 11:33 am
#20

This article is from the Canadian Taxpayers' Federation. I wonder if it will help bolster Dhanraj's case against the CBC, when he claims they aren't as transparent as he thinks they should be. 

CBC caught trying to keep Canadians in the dark 

 
Posted by RadioActive
July 14, 2025 8:25 am
#21

Former Global anchor Lesie Roberts weighs in on the controversies surrounding the CBC. 

"The CBC can no longer afford to act like it is untouchable. When you’re funded by the public to the tune of over a billion dollars a year, you owe Canadians a fulfilled mandate — true journalism. And right now, that’s not what Canadians are getting."

CBC has eroded trust in journalism. It must be reformed

 
Posted by Dial Twister
July 14, 2025 8:41 am
#22

Wow, the Sun and the National Post have similar opinions. Who knew?

 
Posted by RadioActive
July 14, 2025 9:02 am
#23

This isn't about the Sun or the Post per se. I thought it was worth reading because it came from a former Global TV anchor, who would understand the behind-the-scenes working of a newsroom. Albeit one who left his network under some difficult circumstances. 

 
Posted by Saul
July 14, 2025 9:09 am
#24

I see nothing hugely wrong with having right-wing and even fairly far-right pundits on for discussions, just as I have no serious problem with having representation from the Left. SO LONG AS ... they're mixed into the same conversations so they're actually challenged rather than rah-rah! Get a real conversation going that's adeptly moderated. With one of the ground rules for participation being that any participant who interrupts and doesn't actually listen to the others is muted and never invited back. It would, of course, be ideal to find people who are thoughtful and not motor-driven by ideology.

 
Posted by paterson1
July 14, 2025 9:34 am
#25

Any journalist who has something negative to say about CBC is pretty much guaranteed space in the National Post/Sun Media.  Always find it interesting when the Post/Sun from time to time like to talk about how poorly CBC TV does in ratings and revenue.  I wonder if anyone will delve into the circulation of the National Post and Sun Newspapers?  How are they doing?  The papers seem a bit skinny.  I am sure ad revenue and the circulation is robust.. and growing ....

 
Posted by mace
July 14, 2025 10:41 am
#26

paterson1 wrote:

Any journalist who has something negative to say about CBC is pretty much guaranteed space in the National Post/Sun Media.  Always find it interesting when the Post/Sun from time to time like to talk about how poorly CBC TV does in ratings and revenue.  I wonder if anyone will delve into the circulation of the National Post and Sun Newspapers?  How are they doing?  The papers seem a bit skinny.  I am sure ad revenue and the circulation is robust.. and growing ....

 I subscribe to the Sun now as all the neighbourhood newspaper boxes [not just the Sun] have vanished. It is no longer "the little paper that grew" For some time now the Monday-Saturday editions are always exactly 24 pages. Gone from the sports pages are the nightly scoring summaries for NHL games and the mammoth NFL game wrapup coverage on Monday mornings have been replaced by several paragraph sized AP game synopsis. I think because of rising production costs and reduced ad revenue, Post Media has decided that once those 24 pages are filled, that is it.

 
Posted by Paul Jeffries
July 14, 2025 8:55 pm
#27

Saul wrote:

I see nothing hugely wrong with having right-wing and even fairly far-right pundits on for discussions, just as I have no serious problem with having representation from the Left. SO LONG AS ... they're mixed into the same conversations so they're actually challenged rather than rah-rah! Get a real conversation going that's adeptly moderated. With one of the ground rules for participation being that any participant who interrupts and doesn't actually listen to the others is muted and never invited back. It would, of course, be ideal to find people who are thoughtful and not motor-driven by ideology.

Bingo.


PJ
 


ClassicHitsOnline.com...The place where all the cool tunes hang out!
 
Posted by RadioActive
July 21, 2025 5:06 pm
#28

This leaked audio from a meeting with Travis Dhanraj and CBC brass is over a social media post he sent out criticizing then CBC president Catherine Tait. 

According to the National Post:

"His post on X said: “At a time when the public broadcaster is under increasing scrutiny and when transparency is needed,” CBC’s president Catherine Tait had been asked to appear on his show. “We wanted to discuss new budget funding, what it means for jobs & the corporation’s strategic priorities ahead. Our request was declined. This is unfortunate.”

Leaked audio of CBC disciplinary meeting with former TV host Travis Dhanraj

 
Posted by paterson1
July 21, 2025 6:55 pm
#29

Catherine Tate had already appeared on The National and on radio talking about pay, accountability, her job etc.  She really didn't need to be on Travis' program as well   CBC.ca also covered all of this many times with most comments after the story critical of the crown corporation for all to see and read.  Some of the comments were very rude and personal against Tate.  

As usual, CBC is criticized regardless what they do.  When management or the company talks about itself if they become part of the news, they are shot down for "making it all about them" and if they don't they "aren't being transparent and hiding the real story." or ignoring Canadians.   

I thought CBC/Radio Canada handled the latest federal election and their becoming somewhat of an election issue very well.  They actually didn't report much about the defunding of the corporation, and the possible dismantling of the whole operation.   To me this was the way that a professional company should do it.  Acknowledge it, but let others report on any developments.  CBC was reporting and talking about the issues that voters are actually interested in.  As we witnessed, and has been said many times before, defunding of the CBC was not an issue for the average voter.  CBC read the cards right.  The National Post/Sun Media wrong again... 

Last edited by paterson1 (July 21, 2025 6:57 pm)

 
Posted by Chrisphen
July 21, 2025 6:55 pm
#30

DEBATE ME BRO!!!

 


Page:  Next »

 
Main page
Login
Desktop format