Employees/Shareholders Demand Answers Over Bell Cuts & Exec. Salaries

Skip to: New Posts  Last Post
Posted by RadioActive
May 2, 2024 4:45 pm
#1

When your own shareholders demand answers on why execs. responsible for laying off 4,800 employees got huge raises, you have to know there's a bit of a credibility gap. 

Dividend hike, CEO pay questioned at BCE annual meeting following job cuts

 
Posted by newsguy1
May 2, 2024 5:12 pm
#2

Years ago I covered some of a mammoth strike at Goldcorp in Ontario.
At a shareholders meeting in Toronto several of the shaeholders begged the company to settle because people were being ruined, losing their homes and all their savings.
Goldcorp management ignored their own shareholders and refused.
After nearly four years on the picket line, a majority of the roughly 100 workers agreed to end their dispute with Goldcorp Inc. by resigning from the mine in Balmertown.

 
Posted by Chrisphen
May 2, 2024 6:18 pm
#3

I worked the Goldcorp AGM just after they crushed the union. The execs were positively giddy.

My takeaway from the event (aside from a t-shirt) was that Rob McEwen was a garbage human being. Just fetid trash with a goal in life.

 
Posted by Saul
May 2, 2024 6:39 pm
#4

Whether in radio / media / communications, or elsewhere... If they're allowed - no, rewarded - for pulling off cuts etc, and ultimately hurting people's lives, as well as the product, who should get the blame?

 
Posted by RadioAaron
May 2, 2024 6:50 pm
#5

Saul wrote:

Whether in radio / media / communications, or elsewhere... If they're allowed - no, rewarded - for pulling off cuts etc, and ultimately hurting people's lives, as well as the product, who should get the blame?

The general population vote for the current economic model election after election.
 

 
Posted by Dial Twister Online!
May 2, 2024 6:53 pm
#6

Saul wrote:

Whether in radio / media / communications, or elsewhere... If they're allowed - no, rewarded - for pulling off cuts etc, and ultimately hurting people's lives, as well as the product, who should get the blame?

Ourselves, because we put up with it in our society.

 
Posted by Walter
May 2, 2024 8:09 pm
#7

The execs got raises because they canned 5 thousand employees, saving shareholders money and delivered the same crappy product as before at great savings, increasing profits.  It's not personal, it's business.

 
Posted by paterson1
May 2, 2024 11:32 pm
#8

Layoffs are always painful, and most on here have lived through at least one in their career.  Regardless how one feels about Bell, Rogers, Corus, Telus, Loblaws, Royal Bank or any other conglomerate, these companies are the backbone of the economy.  They are a vital investment for thousands of people and for many pension funds across the country.  When they do better, so do millions of people. 

As was alluded above, this is the free enterprise system that we have.  Not always great and not always totally fair but name another that is better, more successful or stable.  If Bell or any other conglomerate over steps or loses the backing of the public or shareholders, they either change, sell out or go out of business.  It looks like Bell executives have some things to answer for to shareholders and the public.

When companies like Bell or Rogers have layoffs, they also always continue to hire. Not necessarily replacing those who were let go but often in other areas of the company that are showing growth potential.  Unfortunately because of the unregulated internet and new media the potential for growth hasn't been in the media divisions for a while for heritage media companies here and elsewhere. 

I think we all know that some big changes are coming in the media landscape and some will be good and others not so much.  A few major players could go dark or drastically downsize in the not distant future. 



 

 


 
Main page
Login
Desktop format