sowny.net | The Southern Ontario/WNY Radio-TV Forum


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

Wed Jan 31 11:16 am  #1


Buffalo TV Changes Part 2

Sorry I couldn't get everything in on the last post.                                                                                                         WNLO: Currently 1000KW at 994'. Application in to increase tower height by 85'. Same Power.                                 WUTV: Currently 1000KW at 983' When they move to ch 36 they have a Construction permit for 400KW at 1368' and an application for 800KW at 1368'  if ch 29 becomes spotty that may be the reason. June-Aug 19 is their move time. WNYO: Currently 198KW at 1234' When they move to ch 16, 99.8KW at 1234'  Application in for 575KW at 1079'. There is a slight signal null between Toronto and Oshawa. Hope this helps.

 

Wed Jan 31 11:32 am  #2


Re: Buffalo TV Changes Part 2

Sounds like bad news for those who watch anything OTA on Fox. I'm not sure why they would want to reduce their power but hopefully it will still be receivable most of the time here. Right now, it's one of the better signals into the GTA. 

If there was one station I'd like to see get a boost it's low-power WBBZ, currently on virtual channel 67 (actually on channel 7.) MeTV is the kind of network it would be great to receive but the station comes in here maybe once or twice a year in the summer, when conditions are just right. And it usually doesn't last long. 

 

Wed Jan 31 1:24 pm  #3


Re: Buffalo TV Changes Part 2

mace wrote:

Sorry I couldn't get everything in on the last post.                                                                                                         WNLO: Currently 1000KW at 994'. Application in to increase tower height by 85'. Same Power.                                 WUTV: Currently 1000KW at 983' When they move to ch 36 they have a Construction permit for 400KW at 1368' and an application for 800KW at 1368'  if ch 29 becomes spotty that may be the reason. June-Aug 19 is their move time. WNYO: Currently 198KW at 1234' When they move to ch 16, 99.8KW at 1234'  Application in for 575KW at 1079'. There is a slight signal null between Toronto and Oshawa. Hope this helps.

Increase in height to the existing tower (add pieces to it?) or whole new tower?  

 

Wed Jan 31 1:31 pm  #4


Re: Buffalo TV Changes Part 2

For WUTV question is whether your OTA reception for WIVB is currently reasonable.  Since WUTV will be transmitting from WIVB's current tower, comparing apples to apples:   WIVB transmits with 790 KW from Colden NY off of Center Street.  WUTV will transmit with 800 KW.  But the antenna is 800M above sea level at Colden is much higher than Grand Island.   Channel 39 (WIBV's current channel) is also subject to interference from Toronto's Ch. 40, particularly during certain fade-down weather conditions.  Despite all of that, in Mid-Town WIVB is quite reliable.   So WUTV should be similar.  The big "winner" should be Channel 49.  Again, apples to apples, its ERP will go from 198 KW to 575 KW from the same site.  But with the frequency change from UHF 49 down to UHF 16, propagation should be much more reliable, and if you go to fccdata.org - you will see a fairly good projected signal that gets to the middle of L. Ontario.  Comparable to other Buffalo stations - in their current operation.   The big winner is obviously WIVB, when it moves to Ch. 32, the signal will go to the edge of Brampton, as will WNLO the CW affiliate.   The other "big" winner is WNED, which is tricky. in terms of reliable reception...it goes from 156 KW ERP up to 345 KW ERP and drops from Ch 43 (also impacted by Toronto stations) down to Ch. 31.   The fccdata.org map indicates a significant improvement for WNED. Basically no change in coverage for WGRZ though it does raise its power by 42KW (10%).  That 10% increase does not always equate to a major coverage change, but every DB of signal increase will make a difference out at the fringes...which is where we are in fact we are beyond the fringes...  I also see a lot of variations between TV manufacturers.  LG currently seems to have among the best tuners.  Again, apples-to-apples, stations that don't "lock" in on an older Samsung, are stable on newer vintage LG UHD 4K tv's and LG 1080 capable TV/s  Bottom line, since we are outside of the predicted coverage area for most Buffalo UHF's, every DB of signal loss, at your antenna, antenna line, mis-pointed antenna, or TV tuner can impact reliability of reception.  That could all change of course, if/when stations convert to ATSC 3.0 and we will all need new tuners or have to buy set-top boxes to keep our sets operating.  Unfortunately even so-called "smart tv" sets, might not be able to upgrade the firmware in their OTA tuners via the Internet.   

Advice if you wish to receive the Buffalo stations through severe weather and fade-down situations, invest in a reasonable pre-amp -under $100.   The improvement in signal margins may surprise you - with far less signal loss.  I did a re-build using a very old antenna (45 years+), which was refurbished last fall..added a preamp.and signals are far more stable.  

This could get very interesting, given the frequency separation of some of the Buffalo stations from stations on the CN tower.

Last edited by tvguy (Wed Jan 31 1:34 pm)

 

Wed Jan 31 4:16 pm  #5


Re: Buffalo TV Changes Part 2

I added a preamp and can't get Fox for the life of me.  That's ok, I get Quest now.

 

Wed Jan 31 5:01 pm  #6


Re: Buffalo TV Changes Part 2

I get Fox WUTV in the winter and barely in the summer.  All other Buffalo stations come in all the time.  

These changes look all positive to me! 

Last edited by markow202 (Wed Jan 31 5:01 pm)

 

Thu Feb 1 1:58 pm  #7


Re: Buffalo TV Changes Part 2

RadioActive wrote:

Sounds like bad news for those who watch anything OTA on Fox. I'm not sure why they would want to reduce their power but hopefully it will still be receivable most of the time here. Right now, it's one of the better signals into the GTA. 

If there was one station I'd like to see get a boost it's low-power WBBZ, currently on virtual channel 67 (actually on channel 7.) MeTV is the kind of network it would be great to receive but the station comes in here maybe once or twice a year in the summer, when conditions are just right. And it usually doesn't last long. 

Unfortunately, no such luck. According to FCCdata.org, WBBZ has no pending applications to improve their signal north of the border. We are stuck with their popgun 27KW output from a 300' tower.

     Thread Starter